Eastern Illinois University Logo
Program Analysis |

Student Affairs

Program List

Section 1: History & Relevance

This criterion shows how the program is aligned with the university mission:

Eastern Illinois University is a public comprehensive university that offers superior, accessible undergraduate and graduate education. Students learn the methods and results of free and rigorous inquiry in the arts, humanities, sciences, and professions, guided by a faculty known for its excellence in teaching, research, creative activity, and service. The university community is committed to diversity and inclusion and fosters opportunities for student- faculty scholarship and applied learning experiences within a student- centered campus culture. Throughout their education, students refine their abilities to reason and to communicate clearly so as to become responsible citizens and leaders.

The university mission statement sets standards and expectations for programs. Programs will vary in their purposes, clienteles, and methodologies, but all programs are expected to support the university's mission in some way and achieve its stated expectations of excellence. The pattern of achievements and expectations is different for a mature program than a nascent one, so program history is relevant.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Program Mission

What is the program’s mission statement or statement of purpose? Why does the program exist?

Mission Statement of the EIU Fraternity & Sorority Community

The Eastern Illinois University Fraternity & Sorority Community prides itself in tradition and academic excellence. We aim to further develop men and women in the areas of integrity, leadership, and high moral values in order to better ourselves, and the community, through service.


How does the program mission align with the university mission?

Fraternity & Sorority Programs primary alignment with the University mission through “applied learning experiences within a student-centered campus culture.” Students are provided with opportunities to develop leadership skills in support of their organizations, work and live in an environment where peer accountability is important, and provide service to the community through programs and philanthropies. The fraternities and sororities also provide significant social and educational programming in support of a “student-centered campus culture.”

 

Services Provided

Whom does the program serve?

Fraternity & Sorority Programs supports over 1,500 students in 26 fraternity & sorority chapters, with three governing councils. In the Spring of 2013, that covered 22% of full-time undergraduate students.


What are the services provided? How do these services align with the university mission and program mission?

The primary service to the chapters comes from direct advising of chapter leaders, in partnership with advisors designated by the various national organizations and organizational headquarters staff. The office coordinates and presents leadership retreats/workshops for presidents at the beginning of each semester, facilitates chapter participation in Homecoming and other student activities, and through the councils coordinates educational programming each semester. The office is also engaged in coordinating registered social functions, philanthropies and community service. With a committee of students, the office advises and facilitates Greek Week each Spring. The office also coordinates and supports recruitment activities, in support of each council. Again, this is in support of “applied learning experiences within a student-centered campus culture.”

Program History

Describe the program’s origins (e.g. year established, purpose, expectations).

The first fraternity at Eastern Illinois was established in 1930 (Phi Sigma Epsilon), and the first sorority came in 1942 (Sigma Sigma Sigma). The years following World War II saw the greatest growth in adding chapters. This was a way to provide support and structure for a growing student population, and most of the organizations provided housing for their members. A second wave of growth took place in the 1980s and 90s providing more opportunities for student involvement. The first NPHC (historically African-American fraternity) was established in 1968 (Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc.), followed by the first NPHC sorority in 1971 (Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.)


How has the unit changed or adapted over time?

The two biggest influences on fraternities and sororities over time have been the move to on-campus chapter housing, and the increased importance of policies and procedures to limit risky behavior. This has led to a greater importance on reviewing and registering social events with alcohol, immediately addressing concerns related to potential hazing or other behavior, and a greater oversight by the University.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program’s history and relevance to university mission.

Section 2: Internal demand for the program

No single program can achieve the university's mission on its own, and this criterion captures the interconnections among programs. Academic programs provide students with general education courses, foundation and principles courses, and specialized course(s) in support of other programs. Administrative programs may serve a variety of internal clientele, and the choice between internally or externally provided services may be relevant in some cases.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Demand for Services

Provide data, if available, on the numbers of students, faculty, staff, or others served by the program during the past four years. If no data are available, please estimate the numbers served annually.

  • Total Members:
  • Spring 2013 – 1,572 (22.4%); Fall 2012 – 1,598
  • Spring 2012 – 1,556 (20.4%); Fall 2011 – 1,608
  • Spring 2011 – 1,526 (19.0%); Fall 2010 – 1,539
  • Total New Members:
  • Spring 2013 – 153; Fall 2012 – 429
  • Spring 2012 – 130; Fall 2011 – 436
  • Spring 2011 – 118; Fall 2010 – 403
Collaboration with Academic Programs

Does the program offer any co-curricular opportunities for students (e.g., internships, RSO support, service-learning activities)? Please describe.

Through leadership opportunities within fraternity/sorority chapters and councils, students are able to develop skills in managing large groups of peers, budgeting and program development, and communication skills. The office also coordinates attendance for approximately 30 students at a regional leadership conference each February. Each of the fraternity & sorority national organization also has annual regional and national conferences that are attended by undergraduate members. All of the chapters are also required to perform community service and philanthropy to support local and national charities.


Does the program contribute to the delivery of academic programs (e.g., providing professional expertise, serving as adjunct faculty)? Please describe.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the internal demand for the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., curriculum changes made by another program) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Over the past three years, the number of students participating in fraternities & sororities has remained very consistent. With the reduced number of students enrolled, that has allowed for an increase in the percentage of students involved in our programs. In the coming years, we expect a demand for other cultural-based fraternities and sororities to arise based on the changing demographics of the student body.

 

Section 3: External demand for the program

The external demands for programs stem from a number of sources: students and their families, employers and business partners, alumni, donors and other friends of the university, and the general citizenry. The establishing legislation for the university requires it to offer courses of instruction, conduct research, and offer public services. The Illinois Board of Higher Education's Public Agenda for Illinois Higher Education establishes expectations for increasing educational attainment, ensuring college affordability, addressing workforce needs, and enhancing economic development.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Expectations

Is the program accredited or approved by a recognized external agency or otherwise certified to meet established professional standards? Provide an executive summary of and link to the program’s most recent accreditation or certification report, if available.


Is the program required to meet any regulatory or legal requirements? Is the program subject to any special auditing requirements?

Community Involvement

What are the most important outreach or public service activities supported by the program?

 

 


How do the local community and the region benefit from the program?

Each fraternity & sorority chapter is required to perform community service, and raise funds for philanthropic efforts. While several organizations have connections to national charities, we emphasize the need to provide support and service within the local community. For example, as part of Greek Week last Spring, the members of the fraternities and sororities raised over $1,500 to help a local community build a baseball facility for its youth, spent a day providing activities for the students at Charleston’s Jefferson Elementary School, and hosted a speaker on the importance of organ donation for over 600 students (many signed up at the event to become donors).

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the external demand for the program.

Section 4: Quality of program outcomes

Assessment and accreditation of academic programs today tend to be more focused on program outcomes than inputs. This criterion focuses on external validations of quality and uses multiple measures to identify exemplary performance and achievements. Both student and faculty outcomes will be relevant for academic programs. Administrative programs are expected to use best practices and provide value to the clienteles served.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Outcomes Assessment

What are the two or three more important measureable outcomes tracked to assess program quality? Does the program conduct an outcomes assessment, and if so, what has been the impact?

The primary numbers tracked by Fraternity & Sorority Programs are membership numbers, and group academic performance. The membership numbers for the past three years are provided under item #2. The overall academic performance for the past three years are:

  • All F&S Semester GPA:
  • Spring 2013 – 2.92; Fall 2012 – 2.88
  • Spring 2012 – 2.92; Fall 2011 – 2.86
  • Spring 2011 – 2.94; Fall 2010 – 2.92

During that time, the overall semester GPA for all EIU undergraduates has ranged from 2.73 to 2.82. Detailed chapter and community academic information can be found on our website at http://www.eiu.edu/grklife/academics.php.

 

Best Practices

What are the two or three most effective best practices that the program has implemented? What benefits have been gained from implementing these best practices?

External Recognitions

What external recognitions (e.g., awards, accommodations, professional certifications, references in trade publications) have the program and its staff received in the past three years?

  • Jaclyn D’Andrea, Graduate Assistant, received      Order of Omega Graduate Fellowship
  • Jaclyn D’Andrea, Graduate Assistant, had an      overview of her thesis published in the AFA on-line journal, Oracle, in      May. She will be receiving an award from the Center for the Study of the      College Fraternity for outstanding graduate thesis at the AFA Annual      Meeting in December 2013.
Professional Organizations

Is the program active with any regional, national, or international professional organizations?

Dean Harwood, Director of Fraternity & Sorority Programs, is a member of the Association of Fraternity/Sorority Advisors (AFA). Graduate staff have also been members of AFA. Our three governing councils are members of the Association of Fraternal Leadership and Values, thus providing staff access to that organization, its resources, and conference.


Note any presentations, publications, or offices held in the last three years.

  • Dean      Harwood, attended Association of Fraternity/Sorority Advisors (AFA) Annual      Meeting in 2012, AFLV-Central Conference, and AFA Region 3 in 2013.      Presented a session on current events in the fraternity/sorority world at      AFLV and the AFA Region 3 summer meeting.
  • Jaclyn      D’Andrea, Graduate Assistant, attended AFA Annual Meeting, attended and      presented at AFLV-Central Conference
  • Dean      Harwood attended the Association of Fraternity/Sorority Advisors Annual      Meeting in 2010. Co-presented two conference sessions.
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the quality of program outcomes.

Section 5: Resources Generated by the Program

Programs may generate resources in a number of ways: enrollments, grants, fundraising, income-producing contracts, ticket sales, and provision of services. Interconnections among programs create implicit cross-subsidies, with some programs being net payers and others being net receivers. Resources in this context need not be financial. Relationships with community colleges, schools and businesses, and government bodies also benefit the university.

Revenues
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
50020-Fees and Fines 214,502 203,085 188,510 173,811
 
240002-General Fund - Camps & Conferences
50020-Fees and Fines -10,444 0 0 0
50040-Investments and Recovery 0 0 0 24,224
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 41,830 43,740 37,520 39,100
Total: 31,386 43,740 37,520 63,324
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 122,441 95,836 93,944 102,943
 
240004-Panther Camps
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 297,987 256,980 246,282 227,113
50040-Investments and Recovery 0 286 0 0
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 4,200 4,200 4,200 7,800
Total: 4,200 4,486 4,200 7,800
 
240006-Parking Division Support
50020-Fees and Fines 18,982 10,496 10,921 8,126
50080-Other Revenue 0 27,366 0 0
Total: 18,982 37,862 10,921 8,126
50020-Fees and Fines 1,405,209 1,331,846 1,268,288 1,167,257
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 11,836 11,879 11,853 11,823
Total: 1,417,045 1,343,725 1,280,141 1,179,080
 
340099-Fixed Costs - Rec Center
50040-Investments and Recovery 0 0 16 1,653
50080-Other Revenue 0 0 0
Total: 0 0 16 1,653
Program Total: 2,106,543 1,985,714 1,861,533 1,763,849
Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Funding Data Pending

Note any special benefits (e.g., personnel support, equipment, permanent improvements) that the program has received in the past three years from its grants and other sponsored programs.

Relationships

How does the program benefit from donor gifts (e.g., scholarships, endowed chairs)? Does donor support provide a significant percentage of the program’s overall funding?

List two or three key relationships that the program maintains with external constituencies (e.g., community colleges, other universities, government bodies). How do these relationships advance the university mission or otherwise benefit the university?

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the resources generated by the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., revenue pass-throughs) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 6: Productivity of the program

Productivity refers to the outcomes and resources generated by the program relative to its size and scope. Productivity measures tend to be quantitative, based on metrics like student credit hour production, degree completions, and number of students or other clientele served, relative to the size of the faculty or staff assigned to the program. A program's productivity can be negatively impacted if its resources are too thinly spread to achieve a critical mass or if its resources are imbalanced relative to program needs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Metrics and Benchmarks

Provide an executive summary of and link to any metrics or benchmarks that the program tracks to measure productivity.

As noted earlier, Fraternity & Sorority Programs serves a student population of over 1,500. Membership and group academic date can be found at http://www.eiu.edu/grklife/academics.php. The staff for this program consists of one full-time Director, one Graduate Assistant, and an Office Manager that is shared with Student Community Service. We also receive support from the four Graduate Associate Residence Directors in Greek Court in advising student groups and activities.

Staff Productivity

What initiatives has the program implemented to enhance staff productivity (e.g., access to training, workflow improvements)? Briefly describe the costs and benefits of these initiatives.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the productivity of the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., accreditation requirements, curricular changes, program restructuring) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

It is important to note when addressing program productivity that the Office of Fraternity & Sorority Programs has no programming budget, and the student organizations that we support do not receive any allocated funds or student activity fees. All of the programs and activities are funded by the undergraduate members, through their chapter and council dues. Other than the costs related to the staff and office, all of the activities and events provided by Fraternity & Sorority Programs, and the fraternity & sorority chapters, are self-funded.

Section 7: Costs associated with the program

Program analysis will be tied to the university's financial ledgers. A program by definition uses university resources, and tying to the accounting system helps ensure that no programs are overlooked in the analysis. Metrics in this criterion are used to identify all of the costs of delivering the program. Many of these costs are direct, but some may be implicit or indirect costs not directly associated with any financial payment. Programs may also be drivers of efficiencies that can help reduce the costs of delivering other programs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Expenditures
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
60010-Administrative 173,117 270,830 371,072 349,857
60020-Civil Service 16,583 54,474 59,931 61,416
60030-Faculty - 4,000 17,242 5,040
60040-Graduate Assistants - 8,950 18,300 34,535
70020-Contractual Services 6,562 43,567 30,709 12,968
70030-Commodities 1,662 13,848 12,683 17,106
70040-Capital Expenditures - 39,340 24,943 -
70050-Travel 2,572 3,988 10,443 8,551
70070-Other Expenses 1,584 968 572 -
Total: 202,079 439,965 545,896 489,473
 
140015-Student Recruitment
70070-Other Expenses 127,681 196,609 187,604 195,651
70020-Contractual Services 1,840 1,762 1,671 2,147
70030-Commodities 365 - 426 107
70040-Capital Expenditures - - 240 -
Total: 2,205 1,762 2,336 2,254
 
140060-Student Services
70020-Contractual Services 416 4,979 1,406 3,321
70030-Commodities 20 - 736 -
70050-Travel - - 320 1,602
Total: 436 4,979 2,462 4,923
70030-Commodities 10,208 10,240 9,923 9,570
 
240001-Shuttle Bus Fee
60010-Administrative 11,068 - - -
60020-Civil Service 59,884 66,473 93,698 65,535
60030-Faculty - 6,000 3,600 -
60040-Graduate Assistants - - 23,625 -
60060-Fringe Benefits 3,036 3,325 3,087 5,085
60070-Leave Payouts - 9 - -
70020-Contractual Services 34,471 33,506 25,855 49,725
70030-Commodities 1,801 1,355 575 1,372
70040-Capital Expenditures 8,613 6,500 - 8,675
70050-Travel 45,532 36,387 38,906 36,194
70060-Waivers 3,603 3,647 3,860 3,252
Total: 168,007 157,202 193,207 169,838
60010-Administrative - - - 8,308
60060-Fringe Benefits 1,012 - - -
70020-Contractual Services 1,459 1,246 1,351 5,553
70030-Commodities - - 6,153 20,648
70040-Capital Expenditures - 24,224 46,383 28,576
Total: 2,471 25,470 53,886 63,085
 
240003-Music Camps
60010-Administrative - 1,392 450 450
60020-Civil Service 9,600 998 - 2,000
60030-Faculty 44,141 33,183 37,380 40,907
60050-Student Employees 7,034 7,511 7,167 6,092
70020-Contractual Services 54,511 40,713 39,991 44,236
70030-Commodities 5,443 5,331 6,081 6,614
70040-Capital Expenditures - - - 150
70050-Travel 872 843 894 891
Total: 121,601 89,971 91,963 101,340
60010-Administrative 5,976 34,944 7,241 7,794
60020-Civil Service - - 361 1,362
60030-Faculty 144,404 93,449 119,679 127,229
60040-Graduate Assistants 4,321 550 1,475 275
60050-Student Employees 26,234 22,660 16,900 14,222
70020-Contractual Services 111,245 88,428 72,850 54,337
70030-Commodities 17,577 14,237 29,311 5,224
70050-Travel 802 291 245 440
Total: 310,559 254,560 248,061 210,882
 
240005-Student Affairs Special Projects
70020-Contractual Services 252 74 1,311 7,352
70030-Commodities 870 237 - 1,099
70050-Travel - - - 504
Total: 1,122 310 1,311 8,955
70020-Contractual Services 13,917 14,395 284 82
70030-Commodities - - - 1,439
70040-Capital Expenditures - - - 2,075
Total: 13,917 14,395 284 3,596
 
340001-Recreation Center - General
70020-Contractual Services 210 210 210 105
70040-Capital Expenditures - - - -
70060-Waivers 24,251 19,061 20,844 18,829
Total: 24,461 19,271 21,054 18,934
60010-Administrative 1,441 1,459 1,473 1,630
60020-Civil Service 152,692 143,693 145,915 150,479
60060-Fringe Benefits 10,664 9,910 9,854 9,678
60070-Leave Payouts 2,234 2,244 450 1,592
70020-Contractual Services 274,042 265,618 194,694 187,761
70030-Commodities 762 102 - 126
70040-Capital Expenditures 89,386 851 2,613 146
70050-Travel 211 45 404 2,160
70090-Transfers 539,543 539,150 539,079 539,236
Total: 1,070,975 963,073 894,483 892,808
Program Total: 2,055,723 2,177,808 2,252,470 2,171,309
Staffing
140000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 3.00 1.50 3.50 5.50 7.50
Admin/Professional 1.00 1.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Civil Service 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 4.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
240001 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 5.00 5.50 5.00 5.00 4.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
240002 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Admin/Professional 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
240003 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
240004 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the costs associated with the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., expenditures made centrally or externally, expenditures made on behalf of other units) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Fraternity & Sorority Programs does not have its own accounts. We do not receive any allocated funds or student activity fees. Office expenses are included with the Office of Student Life, and personnel & travel expenses go through the accounts of the Vice President for Student Affairs.

Fraternity & Sorority Programs

FY11

FY12

FY13

Total   FTE personnel

     

        Admin/Professional

     

        Civil Service

     

        Graduate Assistants

     

Section 8: Program impact on university mission

This criterion may be considered a catch-all for relevant information not covered elsewhere. It focuses on reasons why a program should be maintained or strengthened, the essentiality of the program to the university and its mission, the contributions that the program makes to other programs' successes, and the benefits that the university receives from having the program. The university's vision calls for making personal connections and having a global reach and impact, and programs may have unique aspects that contribute to this vision.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Distinctive and Unique Aspects

How does the program seek to distinguish itself from similar programs at other institutions?

While fraternity & sorority communities are common at Universities across the country, the elements that are unique to EIU are the presence of a large, University-owned and operated, residential community designed for use by fraternities and sororities, and the relatively large percentage of students involved. Many other campuses are developing fraternity/sorority villages, but EIU was one of the earlier developments in this area. While the residential component is managed and operated by Housing & Dining Service, it does have an impact on the makeup of the community and the events and activities provided by Fraternity & Sorority Programs. With 22% of undergraduate students involved in fraternities and sororities, our community is larger than would be projected for a similar-sized regional state institution.

Note any unique and/or essential contributions that the program makes to the university.

While metrics are not currently available, research at other institutions and anecdotal evidence from EIU, indicate that fraternity and sorority membership plays a significant role in retention for those students. This is consistent with research on the importance of student engagement outside the classroom, and it is an area that deserves additional research. There is also research that shows that the level of engagement in fraternities and sororities also leads to greater engagement and giving as alumni. Again, this is an area that deserves additional research specific to EIU.

Program-specific Metrics (optional)

Provide any program-specific metrics that help to document program contributions or program quality. Examples of some commonly used program-specific metrics may be found here.

As indicated by the academic and membership reports (http://www.eiu.edu/grklife/academics.php), members of fraternities and sororities, as a group, have higher semester grade point averages than the overall undergraduate population.

 

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program impact on the university mission.

Section 9: Future opportunities for the program

No program has all the resources it wants or needs, and new or reallocated funds are scarce. This criterion provides an opportunity analysis to identify new and innovative ideas to promote a sustainable academic and financial future for the university. Identifiable trends in student demographics and interests, technological developments, and partnerships with businesses, schools, alumni, and donors are just a few possible avenues for future opportunities. Many of the opportunities that programs identify will tie back to the university's strategic plan, which specifies six key areas that we want to enhance or strengthen.

Planning Limit all responses to 300 words

Provide a link to or listing of the program’s goals and/or strategic plan.

What role will the program have in the implementation of the university’s strategic plan (provide link to strategic plan)?

Opportunities Limit all responses to 500 words

In the next two or three years, what best practices, improvements in operations, or other opportunities to advance the university’s mission are likely to be implemented?

The changing demographics and enrollment numbers provide both the greatest challenges, and the best opportunities, for the fraternity & sorority community. The changing demographics indicate a greater diversity within the student body. This will likely show itself through an interest and demand for more culturally based fraternities and sororities. There are several organizations that express interest in serving this population, and it is likely that will result in new chapters in the next few years. The stagnant enrollment numbers have caused the fraternities and sororities to take a closer look at how they recruit members. Thus far, they have been up to the challenge in maintaining membership numbers. AS the enrollment rebounds, there will be an opportunity to add new chapters that will revitalize the community with new ideas (and fewer bad habits).

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand future opportunities for the program.