Eastern Illinois University Logo
Program Analysis |

Facilities Planning and Management

Program List

Section 1: History & Relevance

This criterion shows how the program is aligned with the university mission:

Eastern Illinois University is a public comprehensive university that offers superior, accessible undergraduate and graduate education. Students learn the methods and results of free and rigorous inquiry in the arts, humanities, sciences, and professions, guided by a faculty known for its excellence in teaching, research, creative activity, and service. The university community is committed to diversity and inclusion and fosters opportunities for student- faculty scholarship and applied learning experiences within a student- centered campus culture. Throughout their education, students refine their abilities to reason and to communicate clearly so as to become responsible citizens and leaders.

The university mission statement sets standards and expectations for programs. Programs will vary in their purposes, clienteles, and methodologies, but all programs are expected to support the university's mission in some way and achieve its stated expectations of excellence. The pattern of achievements and expectations is different for a mature program than a nascent one, so program history is relevant.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Program Mission

What is the program’s mission statement or statement of purpose? Why does the program exist?

Our Mission Statement is “Facilities Planning & Management provides excellence in comprehensive facilities services that support the missions of the Business Affairs Division and EIU.”  Our Motto is “Service with Excellence.”


How does the program mission align with the university mission?

Facilities Planning & Management support services provide the places for the university mission to excel and for its students and faculty to thrive.

Services Provided

Whom does the program serve?

Facilities Planning & Management serves each and every campus unit and campus stakeholder, whether faculty, student, staff, alumni, visiting parent, or guest, in some manner on a daily basis.  Some services are directly provided and noticed while others indirectly provide value and go largely unnoticed until something goes wrong.  An example of the latter is the assumption that each time a light switch is flicked the light will go on – the electrician and building service worker that maintain the system and change the light bulb are largely unnoticed until the light doesn’t work.  


What are the services provided? How do these services align with the university mission and program mission?

Facilities Planning & Management provides overall operations, maintenance, construction, renewal and continuous stewardship of the campus’ physical facilities.  Specific areas of responsibility include management, oversight, fiscal authority and direction of maintenance functions in all buildings; grounds care; utilities and their infrastructure; engineering and architectural service delivery; campus design and construction activities; project management and coordination; renovations and alterations to campus assets; and janitorial services in administrative, classroom and athletics buildings.

Program History

Describe the program’s origins (e.g. year established, purpose, expectations).

Various elements of facilities maintenance and operations date from the original construction of the first permanent facility with the builders and custodial staff.


How has the unit changed or adapted over time?

As the footprint of the physical plant, grounds, and utilities have increased in size and complexity the unit has grown in numbers and technical expertise to address the needs of the campus community and programs.  A prime example is the use of web-based computerized temperature controls that could not have been considered during the construction of Old Main but now require specialized tools, equipment, software, and personnel.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program’s history and relevance to university mission.

Section 2: Internal demand for the program

No single program can achieve the university's mission on its own, and this criterion captures the interconnections among programs. Academic programs provide students with general education courses, foundation and principles courses, and specialized course(s) in support of other programs. Administrative programs may serve a variety of internal clientele, and the choice between internally or externally provided services may be relevant in some cases.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Demand for Services

Provide data, if available, on the numbers of students, faculty, staff, or others served by the program during the past four years. If no data are available, please estimate the numbers served annually.

Facilities Planning & Management provides services to each member of the campus community on a daily basis.  Those services include everything from cleaning the floors and emptying the trash to making sure the heating, air conditioning, lights, and power work in the classrooms, offices, and dormitory rooms.

Collaboration with Academic Programs

Does the program offer any co-curricular opportunities for students (e.g., internships, RSO support, service-learning activities)? Please describe.

Facilities Planning & Management currently partners with Geography to provide work opportunities to students in Geographic Information Sciences.


Does the program contribute to the delivery of academic programs (e.g., providing professional expertise, serving as adjunct faculty)? Please describe.

Management staff and other members of the office staff contribute directly to the Masters of Science in Sustainable Energy Practicum with materials and hours of instruction.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the internal demand for the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., curriculum changes made by another program) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 3: External demand for the program

The external demands for programs stem from a number of sources: students and their families, employers and business partners, alumni, donors and other friends of the university, and the general citizenry. The establishing legislation for the university requires it to offer courses of instruction, conduct research, and offer public services. The Illinois Board of Higher Education's Public Agenda for Illinois Higher Education establishes expectations for increasing educational attainment, ensuring college affordability, addressing workforce needs, and enhancing economic development.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Expectations

Is the program accredited or approved by a recognized external agency or otherwise certified to meet established professional standards? Provide an executive summary of and link to the program’s most recent accreditation or certification report, if available.

N/A


Is the program required to meet any regulatory or legal requirements? Is the program subject to any special auditing requirements?

Certain operations within Facilities Planning & Management are subject to state and federal regulations including fertilizer and pesticide application, professional engineer licenses, architect registration, state plumbing licenses, and licenses to abate asbestos and lead paint.  We observe the requirements listed in the Elevator Code, Life Safety Code, Illinois Historical Preservation Agency statutes, State Fire Marshal requirements,and a myriad of other mandated and recommended codes.

Utilities generation is heavily regulated for emissions discharge and spill containment.  The Clean Air permit process is onerous and subject to review for compliance. The Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code inspections are overseen and coordinated by the State Fire Marshal.

Even the gasoline pumps and water distribution system require an operator who is licensed by the state.

Community Involvement

What are the most important outreach or public service activities supported by the program?

Energy conservation, recycling, and sustainable energy education.  The program provides a considerable number of tours through the Renewable Energy Center to see the biomass process turn wood chips into heat and electricity.  The recycling operation partners with a community organization to provide meaningful employment for developmentally disabled persons.

Eastern Illinois University is one of the most environmentally responsible colleges in the United States and Canada, according to The Princeton Review.

The Design and Construction department is currently overseeing design and construction for the Center for Clean Energy Research which includes a component of the facility dedicated to outreach.  Funds provided by a grant from Charleston Area Charitable Foundation allow local community researchers to occupy a portion of the facility to investigate additional clean energy possibilities.


How do the local community and the region benefit from the program?

The Renewable Energy Center is unique in many respects and garners respect and attention from programs and individuals around the country.  The community and region have a resource in their back yard that is readily accessible for educational and marketing purposes.   The community benefits further from reduced emissions from the technology incorporated in the construction materials and methods.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the external demand for the program.

Section 4: Quality of program outcomes

Assessment and accreditation of academic programs today tend to be more focused on program outcomes than inputs. This criterion focuses on external validations of quality and uses multiple measures to identify exemplary performance and achievements. Both student and faculty outcomes will be relevant for academic programs. Administrative programs are expected to use best practices and provide value to the clienteles served.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Outcomes Assessment

What are the two or three more important measureable outcomes tracked to assess program quality? Does the program conduct an outcomes assessment, and if so, what has been the impact?

N/A

Best Practices

What are the two or three most effective best practices that the program has implemented? What benefits have been gained from implementing these best practices?

Energy conservation and recycling benefit the university and community by allowing resources to be diverted to other programs and diverting recyclable materials from landfills.

Energy purchasing consortium with Illinois State University, Western Illinois University, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, and Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.

The net result of those energy savings is millions of dollars funneled into academic programs.  

 

External Recognitions

What external recognitions (e.g., awards, accommodations, professional certifications, references in trade publications) have the program and its staff received in the past three years?

Eastern Illinois University is one of the most environmentally responsible colleges in the United States and Canada, according to The Princeton Review.

Energy Star certification of multiple facilities by the United States Environmental Protection Agency

LEED Platinum certification of the Renewable Energy Center by the U. S.  Green Building Council

Tree City USA designation by the Arbor Day Foundation

Recognition by the Illinois Fire Inspectors Association as the first Illinois university to meet and exceed the Fire Sprinkler Dormitory Act by installing sprinklers in all residential campus buildings, including Greek housing.

Professional Organizations

Is the program active with any regional, national, or international professional organizations?

APPA – Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers

SCUP – Society for College and University Planning

International Code Council


Note any presentations, publications, or offices held in the last three years.

District Energy - Biomass at Eastern Illinois University: New gasification system replaces coal

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the quality of program outcomes.

Section 5: Resources Generated by the Program

Programs may generate resources in a number of ways: enrollments, grants, fundraising, income-producing contracts, ticket sales, and provision of services. Interconnections among programs create implicit cross-subsidies, with some programs being net payers and others being net receivers. Resources in this context need not be financial. Relationships with community colleges, schools and businesses, and government bodies also benefit the university.

Revenues
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
50040-Investments and Recovery 0 247 2,565 15,000
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 1,766 2,065 1,056 3,932
50080-Other Revenue 21,870 16,905 19,902 20,810
Total: 23,636 19,217 23,522 39,742
 
235002-Campus Projects
50080-Other Revenue 0 0 9,302 0
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 30,165 34,838 58,154 35,833
50080-Other Revenue 0 0 1,116 0
Total: 30,165 34,838 59,270 35,833
 
235008-Renovations and Alterations
50040-Investments and Recovery 0 0 0 9,302
50080-Other Revenue 7,954,822 8,428,472 10,927,669 7,286,592
Total: 7,954,822 8,428,472 10,927,669 7,295,894
50080-Other Revenue 0 0 0 4,171
 
2350D7-ESCO Support
50080-Other Revenue 74,671 258,903 176,942 52,851
50080-Other Revenue 15,899 0 0 0
 
2350D9-Bicycle Rental Program
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 0 0 80 0
50080-Other Revenue 0 0 0 0
Program Total: 8,099,193 8,741,430 11,196,785 7,428,490
Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Funding Data Pending

Note any special benefits (e.g., personnel support, equipment, permanent improvements) that the program has received in the past three years from its grants and other sponsored programs.

The energy sustainability grants received in the recent past have all been reinvested in the physical plant for additional efficiencies.  Including current promised grant monies, the sustainable energy grants total nearly $450,000; all of which have been and will be reinvested in facilities improvements. These efficiencies have allowed reallocation of finances to other campus programs and are not retained by Facilities Planning & Management.

Relationships

How does the program benefit from donor gifts (e.g., scholarships, endowed chairs)? Does donor support provide a significant percentage of the program’s overall funding?

N/A

List two or three key relationships that the program maintains with external constituencies (e.g., community colleges, other universities, government bodies). How do these relationships advance the university mission or otherwise benefit the university?

APPA – Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers

SCUP – Society for College and University Planning

International Code Council membership

Energy purchasing consortium with Illinois State University, Western Illinois University, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, and Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville

City of Charleston, including public works, police, and fire departments

State agencies , including Illinois Board of Higher Education, Illinois Department of Labor, Procurement Policy Board, Illinois Department of Transportation, Capital Development Board, Governor’s Office of Management and Budget, State Universities Civil Service System, Illinois Department of Human Rights

Trade unions representing Painters, Carpenters, Teamsters, Bricklayers, Plumbers & Pipefitters, Construction Laborers, and Electricians

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the resources generated by the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., revenue pass-throughs) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 6: Productivity of the program

Productivity refers to the outcomes and resources generated by the program relative to its size and scope. Productivity measures tend to be quantitative, based on metrics like student credit hour production, degree completions, and number of students or other clientele served, relative to the size of the faculty or staff assigned to the program. A program's productivity can be negatively impacted if its resources are too thinly spread to achieve a critical mass or if its resources are imbalanced relative to program needs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Metrics and Benchmarks

Provide an executive summary of and link to any metrics or benchmarks that the program tracks to measure productivity.

Facilities Planning & Management provided information to APPA (Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers) for inclusion in the Facilities Performance Indicators (FPI) Survey and we compare our levels of staffing and expenditures with other public institutions of higher education.  As capital improvements are continually de-funded the natural progression has been a lower level of planned maintenance, campus customer satisfaction, and academic program effectiveness.  Putting out fires versus planned maintenance negatively impacts recruitment and retention efforts as demonstrated in the piping systems in Life Sciences.

Each survey of effectiveness in comparison to peer institutions reveals we expend fewer resources per square foot and cover more square foot per FTE.

Building Services Workers are generally staffed to provide Level 3 or better cleanliness on a scale of 1-5.

From a recent report from Honeywell, energy consumption efforts have been quite effective with an overall reduction of 40% in calculated energy use intensity (EUI) from FY01 through FY13.  Individual building energy and water metering efforts in the recent past allow targeted programs to eliminate waste and encourage additional conservation.

Staff Productivity

What initiatives has the program implemented to enhance staff productivity (e.g., access to training, workflow improvements)? Briefly describe the costs and benefits of these initiatives.

Through the APPA Institute for Facilities Management staff members are exposed to best practices at other institutions nationwide and establish relationships with peers and industry professionals to further explore opportunities for improvement.

The new Grounds shop and equipment enhancements improve efficiencies per FTE, which will show additional benefits across campus.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the productivity of the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., accreditation requirements, curricular changes, program restructuring) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 7: Costs associated with the program

Program analysis will be tied to the university's financial ledgers. A program by definition uses university resources, and tying to the accounting system helps ensure that no programs are overlooked in the analysis. Metrics in this criterion are used to identify all of the costs of delivering the program. Many of these costs are direct, but some may be implicit or indirect costs not directly associated with any financial payment. Programs may also be drivers of efficiencies that can help reduce the costs of delivering other programs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Expenditures
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
 
135000-Facilities Planning and Management
60010-Administrative 165,316 189,737 92,644 198,406
60020-Civil Service 300,838 313,961 523,096 453,326
60030-Faculty - 200 - -
60050-Student Employees 4,818 1,891 5,926 9,180
70020-Contractual Services 84,308 69,873 140,822 49,314
70030-Commodities 6,602 19,884 48,934 4,765
70050-Travel 144,596 167,293 185,812 40,381
Total: 706,478 762,838 997,234 755,371
60020-Civil Service 35,927 36,376 36,740 23,218
70020-Contractual Services 709 284 135 825
Total: 36,636 36,660 36,875 24,043
 
135020-Asbestos Abatement
60020-Civil Service 121,469 86,631 110,899 56,107
70020-Contractual Services (7,119) 611 1,765 634
70030-Commodities 12,241 3,375 2,679 2,678
70040-Capital Expenditures - 501 9 728
70050-Travel - - - 1,084
Total: 126,590 91,117 115,352 61,230
60020-Civil Service 182,656 229,174 232,728 222,656
70020-Contractual Services 1,002,446 375,254 209,691 216,879
70030-Commodities 17,482 18,401 59,533 -
70040-Capital Expenditures 393,121 711,112 1,579,337 833,641
70050-Travel - 537 1,949 -
Total: 1,595,706 1,334,478 2,083,237 1,273,176
 
135035-FC-Elevator Maintenance
70020-Contractual Services 37,452 38,535 48,923 80,422
70020-Contractual Services 262 900 9,609 14,155
70030-Commodities 3,606 18,152 14,486 3,961
70040-Capital Expenditures 1,886 67,979 71,675 27,213
70050-Travel 283 - - -
Total: 6,037 87,031 95,770 45,329
 
135050-FC-ESCO Principal and Interest
70020-Contractual Services 634,110 419,674 214,100 53,644
70020-Contractual Services 9,751 7,062 9,679 10,578
70030-Commodities 10,939 10,790 12,026 -
70050-Travel - - - 12,023
Total: 20,690 17,852 21,705 22,601
 
135070-Local Projects
60020-Civil Service 681 - - -
70020-Contractual Services 21,586 96,816 2,112 15,200
70040-Capital Expenditures 144,988 104,032 481,322 96,864
Total: 167,255 200,848 483,434 112,065
70020-Contractual Services 27,379 36,946 62,968 43,197
 
235001-FPM Maintenance
60020-Civil Service 10,581 10,092 7,433 8,855
70020-Contractual Services 1,185 3,450 2,557 5,327
70030-Commodities 11,756 13,900 8,879 8,414
70040-Capital Expenditures - 155 240 2,514
70050-Travel - - 250 1,000
Total: 23,523 27,597 19,358 26,110
60020-Civil Service - 15,127 22,155 16,833
60050-Student Employees 18,793 21,177 16,196 18,018
60060-Fringe Benefits - - 340 336
70020-Contractual Services 282 226 1,083 445
70030-Commodities 586 3,290 1,567 339
70040-Capital Expenditures 1,206 - - -
70050-Travel 7,656 7,728 11,931 8,205
Total: 28,523 47,548 53,271 44,175
 
235005-Indirect Costs-FPM
60020-Civil Service 49 - - -
60050-Student Employees 21,683 38,000 - -
70020-Contractual Services 7,200 - - -
70030-Commodities 5,624 - - -
70050-Travel 499 - - -
Total: 35,054 38,000 - -
60020-Civil Service 2,738,218 3,138,273 3,628,681 2,595,331
60050-Student Employees 9,918 4,659 2,299 -
60060-Fringe Benefits 32,238 26,320 54,836 23,420
60070-Leave Payouts 61 29,273 16 26,143
70020-Contractual Services 136,252 145,858 176,799 144,404
70030-Commodities 5,172,062 5,142,292 7,119,728 4,457,607
70040-Capital Expenditures 9,776 14,346 16,218 5,836
70050-Travel 31,178 44,323 49,716 40,304
Total: 8,129,702 8,545,345 11,048,293 7,293,046
 
2350D7-ESCO Support
70020-Contractual Services 35,217 63,307 72,962 49,655
70030-Commodities 32,987 189,564 103,980 3,195
70040-Capital Expenditures 6,467 6,032 - -
Total: 74,671 258,903 176,942 52,851
70020-Contractual Services 15,899 - - -
 
2350D9-Bicycle Rental Program
70030-Commodities - - 80 -
70020-Contractual Services - 12,793 4,950 3,638
70030-Commodities - - - 3,509
70040-Capital Expenditures - 21,382 (8,318) 25,558
Total: - 34,175 (3,368) 32,705
 
335002-Lantz & Stadium Operations
60020-Civil Service 147,408 146,740 - 4,776
60050-Student Employees - - - 4,546
60070-Leave Payouts 167 - 3,590 -
70020-Contractual Services 68,606 9,914 209 14,582
70030-Commodities 71,828 53,376 - 72,268
70040-Capital Expenditures 7,389 102,307 - 29,738
70050-Travel - - - 12,023
Total: 295,398 312,337 3,799 137,933
60020-Civil Service 187,834 180,949 191,640 194,031
60070-Leave Payouts 694 2,886 - -
70020-Contractual Services 128 249 289 194
70030-Commodities 29,034 61,887 33,696 22,001
70040-Capital Expenditures - 467 - -
Total: 217,690 246,438 225,625 216,226
Program Total: 12,178,793 12,536,323 15,683,598 10,274,123
Staffing
135000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 7.00 11.00 9.00 12.00 10.50
Admin/Professional 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.00 2.50
Civil Service 5.50 6.50 6.00 11.00 7.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
135010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
135020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.67
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.67
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
135030 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
235001 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
235004 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 3.00 5.50 2.50 5.50
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 3.00 5.00 2.00 5.00
235005 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 5.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 5.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
235008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 46.48 27.75 35.33 33.08 31.50
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 44.48 25.75 34.33 33.08 31.50
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
335001 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 46.67 45.95 41.42 41.33 40.17
Admin/Professional 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Civil Service 46.17 45.45 40.92 40.83 39.67
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
335002 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 2.64 3.53 3.58 5.00 5.50
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 2.64 3.53 3.58 3.00 3.50
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
335003 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 4.83 4.20 4.25 4.50 4.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 4.83 4.20 4.25 4.50 4.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the costs associated with the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., expenditures made centrally or externally, expenditures made on behalf of other units) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

92% of the 70050-Travel expenses are not truly travel but instead are utilized for repair, maintenance and insurance on maintenance shop vehicles.  Less than $15,000 was spent in FY2013 for travel related to conferences and training opportunities.  With the new year the vehicle budgets and expenses will be apportioned to the using maintenance shops.

The majority of funds spent on permanent improvements in FY2013 were directed toward O’Brien Stadium track and turf repairs and replacements to aid in student recruitment initiatives.  While the benefits of those expenditures will be noticed in future classes they provided little or no reduction of cataloged deferred maintenance needs in academic facilities.  Key activities benefitting from the improvements are the state track meet, Boys State, Girls State, and athletic programs and camps which expose potential students to the benefits Eastern has to offer.

$56,000 of the FY13 expenses covered retroactive salary increases for the construction laborers as a result of an unfair labor practices complaint.  Legal and back wages to another employee account for approximately $71,000, also in FY13.

Income funds in 350 and 356 were expended for a larger portion of maintenance and operation of Lantz and O’Brien Stadium in a sum approaching $585,000.

350 and 356 appear to be overstated by over $700,000 due to unusual circumstances which will not recur.

The FY15 Resource and Management Plan, Table C107, identifies $6,675,500 in unfunded capital improvement projects.  Each of the projects was appropriated via public act and most were re-appropriated in subsequent acts.  The lack of state funds for execution of the work increases the deferred maintenance backlog.

Section 8: Program impact on university mission

This criterion may be considered a catch-all for relevant information not covered elsewhere. It focuses on reasons why a program should be maintained or strengthened, the essentiality of the program to the university and its mission, the contributions that the program makes to other programs' successes, and the benefits that the university receives from having the program. The university's vision calls for making personal connections and having a global reach and impact, and programs may have unique aspects that contribute to this vision.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Distinctive and Unique Aspects

How does the program seek to distinguish itself from similar programs at other institutions?

The energy conservation efforts and Renewable Energy Center operation are noted by institutions nationwide.

Note any unique and/or essential contributions that the program makes to the university.

Facilities Planning & Management is committed to providing facility services to assure cultural and educational opportunities are delivered to the region and which complement the tradition of distinguished teaching in undergraduate programs. In doing so, the unit strives to be a model of excellence for comprehensive state institutions of its kind in delivering effective and efficient services to the Eastern Illinois University community.  We keep the grass mowed, trash emptied, lights on, and doors open

Program-specific Metrics (optional)

Provide any program-specific metrics that help to document program contributions or program quality. Examples of some commonly used program-specific metrics may be found here.

N/A

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program impact on the university mission.

Section 9: Future opportunities for the program

No program has all the resources it wants or needs, and new or reallocated funds are scarce. This criterion provides an opportunity analysis to identify new and innovative ideas to promote a sustainable academic and financial future for the university. Identifiable trends in student demographics and interests, technological developments, and partnerships with businesses, schools, alumni, and donors are just a few possible avenues for future opportunities. Many of the opportunities that programs identify will tie back to the university's strategic plan, which specifies six key areas that we want to enhance or strengthen.

Planning Limit all responses to 300 words

Provide a link to or listing of the program’s goals and/or strategic plan.

N/A

What role will the program have in the implementation of the university’s strategic plan (provide link to strategic plan)?

Facilities Planning & Management staff are in discussions with the City of Charleston and the Illinois Department of Transportation to assist in creation of a collaborative landscape/streetscape plan from the Neal Welcome Center to 18th Street to more strongly connect campus and community and to provide a welcoming corridor along Lincoln Avenue.

Grounds staff constantly seek to improve the plantings and visual identification to enhance our institutional image with our prospective student market.  Numerous donor opportunities exist in grounds upgrades and enhancements.

The institutional image is a key component of Facilities Planning & Management activities.  Recent efforts include expedient repair of the ‘front gate’ flower bed in time for Homecoming 2013 after an impaired driver destroyed a portion as well as beautification of Old Main.  A significant number of photographs identifying students and alumni with EIU are taken in this landmark location and its appearance is of high importance.

Opportunities Limit all responses to 500 words

In the next two or three years, what best practices, improvements in operations, or other opportunities to advance the university’s mission are likely to be implemented?

Facilities Planning & Management has many challenges in the very near future, including:

Implementation of a more rigorous preventive maintenance program.

Supporting faculty and student recruitment and retention in years of financial restrictions – doing more with less

Aging infrastructure and the associated costs to maintain facilities with systems reaching the end of useful life.  The average age of mission critical buildings is over 67 years old at last review.  As systems fail, the collateral damage to other building systems intensifies costs to correct the original failure.

Costs of providing enhanced technology in building systems.  Costs will include significant first investments as well as continued training.  The payoff in conversion to Direct Digital Controls is widely known and practiced in public and private sectors as it allows long-distance issue diagnostics.  A recent example is the failure of a temperature controller in Lantz during a basketball game where the technician was able to diagnose the 1000 °F reading from home and make corrections.

Investment in personnel as the average employee age increases and the costs involved in training new employees.  The current trade union agreements in the private sector provide better benefits than the state so recruitment and retention of high quality employees may be difficult.

Further reduction in energy and utilities to redirect resources to academic programs – much of the low hanging fruit has been plucked.

Sustainability and carbon footprint reduction – enhancing recycling efforts and sustainable construction

Water conservation and reduction of rainwater flow off campus including rain gardens/features and permeable paving

Effective space utilization where there may be emotional issues tied with ownership

Classrooms of the future which may not include as much brick and mortar construction and more technology to support distance learning

Limited financial resources will continue to surface in the form of reduced state budget availability and tuition caps – we must be affordable

Deferred maintenance is a nation-wide issue whose abeyance and reduction will require partnering with academic resources at each opportunity.  The federal government has recognized a need for reinvestment in the physical facilities of 2.5% to maintain a steady state condition.  A reduced rate of investment will continue to show up in further degradation of the facilities.

Generation of an effective utilities production and distribution model that includes dedicated reserves for equipment repairs and upgrades.  The current utilities generation and distribution systems include single points of failure that may disable significant portions of campus activities upon unscheduled outages.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand future opportunities for the program.

Public/Private Partnerships are utilized in many universities with increasing numbers and applications.  In times of shrinking budgets and funding streams we will investigate opportunities and take appropriate action.