Eastern Illinois University Logo
Program Analysis |

Financial Aid

Program List

Section 1: History & Relevance

This criterion shows how the program is aligned with the university mission:

Eastern Illinois University is a public comprehensive university that offers superior, accessible undergraduate and graduate education. Students learn the methods and results of free and rigorous inquiry in the arts, humanities, sciences, and professions, guided by a faculty known for its excellence in teaching, research, creative activity, and service. The university community is committed to diversity and inclusion and fosters opportunities for student- faculty scholarship and applied learning experiences within a student- centered campus culture. Throughout their education, students refine their abilities to reason and to communicate clearly so as to become responsible citizens and leaders.

The university mission statement sets standards and expectations for programs. Programs will vary in their purposes, clienteles, and methodologies, but all programs are expected to support the university's mission in some way and achieve its stated expectations of excellence. The pattern of achievements and expectations is different for a mature program than a nascent one, so program history is relevant.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Program Mission

What is the program’s mission statement or statement of purpose? Why does the program exist?

The Office of Financial Aid at Eastern Illinois University is comprised of a team of dedicated professionals committed to serving students by providing them information to secure the necessary financial resources to meet their educational goals and financial obligations to the university. We provide quality customer service in delivering information on federal, state, institutional, and private sources of financial aid.

In pursuing our mission we strive to uphold the highest degree of professionalism, confidentiality, honesty, and integrity; embrace emerging technologies; and work collaboratively with all areas of the college, recognizing that only together can we achieve our common goal to enhance enrollment, retention, and academic success of our students.


How does the program mission align with the university mission?

The Office of Financial Aid serves the entire student population at Eastern by helping students receive the financial resources needed to help them meet their educational goals.

Services Provided

Whom does the program serve?

The program serves all students who need assistance with applying and receiving financial aid at Eastern.


What are the services provided? How do these services align with the university mission and program mission?

Program services include information about and awarding of federal, state, institutional, and outside sources of financial aid.

These services help to provide access to undergraduate and graduate education.

Program History

Describe the program’s origins (e.g. year established, purpose, expectations).


How has the unit changed or adapted over time?

The Office of Financial Aid has grown and adapted to include all forms of federal, state, institutional, and outside financial aid, in order to provide comprehensive resources for students.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program’s history and relevance to university mission.

Section 2: Internal demand for the program

No single program can achieve the university's mission on its own, and this criterion captures the interconnections among programs. Academic programs provide students with general education courses, foundation and principles courses, and specialized course(s) in support of other programs. Administrative programs may serve a variety of internal clientele, and the choice between internally or externally provided services may be relevant in some cases.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Demand for Services

Provide data, if available, on the numbers of students, faculty, staff, or others served by the program during the past four years. If no data are available, please estimate the numbers served annually.

Eastern   Illinois University

Office   of Financial Aid

Division of Academic Affairs

EIU   Financial Aid Statistics (Historical Comparison)

Attachment   A - Program Analysis

Source   of Financial Aid (1)

%

2011-2012

%

2010-2011

%

2009-2010

%

2008-2009

%

2007-2008

Federal

68%

$             90,891,948

67%

$             84,569,603

66%

$             77,863,873

61%

$             64,078,104

56%

$             51,535,023

State

11%

$             14,468,132

12%

$             14,555,290

12%

$             13,841,264

13%

$             13,402,020

15%

$             13,479,243

Institutional

14%

$             18,881,399

15%

$             18,352,076

15%

$             17,806,256

17%

$             17,518,441

17%

$             16,094,665

Other

7%

$               8,742,892

7%

$               8,859,397

7%

$               8,827,990

10%

$             10,529,135

12%

$             11,076,755

Total

100%

$           132,984,371

100%

$           126,336,366

100%

$           118,339,383

100%

$         105,527,700

100%

$             92,185,686

 

 

5%

 

7%

 

12%

 

14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Types   of Financial Aid (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

60%

$             80,147,308

58%

$             73,499,845

59%

$             70,246,050

59%

$             62,514,784

56%

$             51,510,294

Work-Study

5%

$               7,274,439

6%

$               7,087,628

6%

$               7,440,244

7%

$               7,076,356

7%

$               6,796,270

Scholarships/Grants

29%

$             38,460,123

31%

$             39,305,172

30%

$             34,938,686

29%

$             30,301,151

31%

$             28,728,920

Academic   Merit Based Schol.

5%

$               7,102,501

5%

$               6,443,721

5%

$               5,714,403

5%

$               5,635,409

6%

$               5,150,202

Total

100%

$           132,984,371

100%

$           126,336,366

100%

$           118,339,383

100%

$         105,527,700

100%

$             92,185,686

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total   FA Recipients (1)

 

9970

 

10153

 

10230

 

10013

 

9725

Undergraduate

85%

8524

86%

8706

85%

8707

85%

8531

86%

8328

Graduate

15%

1446

14%

1447

15%

1523

15%

1482

14%

1397

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total   Enrollment (2)

 

12735

 

13376

 

13793

 

13259

 

13457

Undergraduate

83%

10579

82%

10976

81%

11235

82%

10839

82%

11000

Graduate

17%

2156

18%

2400

19%

2558

18%

2420

18%

2457

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average   FA Award

 

$                     13,338

 

$                     12,443

 

$                     11,568

 

$                   10,539

 

$                       9,479

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

%   of Total Enrollment w/ FA

 

78%

 

76%

 

74%

 

76%

 

72%

Sources:

1)   Illinois Board of Higher Education Annual Report (for financial aid sources);   percentage of UG and GR recipients as reported on the IBHE Annual Summary   Reports.

2)   Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (for enrollment data)

From   12-month unduplicated count by race/ethnicity and gender from Emily Stuby,   Planning and Institutional Research

For   percentage of Academic Merit-Based Scholarship see the file: Z:\Statistics\Academic   Merit-Based Scholarship for HLC Report:

Award   Year

Students

Amount

 

(UNDUPL)

 

1112

2761

$               7,102,501

1011

2333

$               6,443,721

0910

2012

$               5,714,403

0809

2077

$               5,635,409

0708

2307

$               5,150,202

Collaboration with Academic Programs

Does the program offer any co-curricular opportunities for students (e.g., internships, RSO support, service-learning activities)? Please describe.

We currently have a Graduate Assistant and we have had internship opportunities in the past.


Does the program contribute to the delivery of academic programs (e.g., providing professional expertise, serving as adjunct faculty)? Please describe.

The Director of Financial Aid is frequently asked to provide financial and financial aid information to various classes (e.g. University Foundations and Math).

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the internal demand for the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., curriculum changes made by another program) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 3: External demand for the program

The external demands for programs stem from a number of sources: students and their families, employers and business partners, alumni, donors and other friends of the university, and the general citizenry. The establishing legislation for the university requires it to offer courses of instruction, conduct research, and offer public services. The Illinois Board of Higher Education's Public Agenda for Illinois Higher Education establishes expectations for increasing educational attainment, ensuring college affordability, addressing workforce needs, and enhancing economic development.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Expectations

Is the program accredited or approved by a recognized external agency or otherwise certified to meet established professional standards? Provide an executive summary of and link to the program’s most recent accreditation or certification report, if available.

U.S.D.O.E. Eligibility and Certification Approval Report (ECAR)  

U.S.D.O.E. Program Participation Agreement (PPA)  

Please refer to the following links:

http://www.eligcert.ed.gov/ows-doc/eapp.htm

http://www.eligcert.ed.gov/eapp/ecar?ope=001674 (secure login required)

http://www.eligcert.ed.gov/eapp/ppa_doc?ope=001674&id=29424 (secure login required)


Is the program required to meet any regulatory or legal requirements? Is the program subject to any special auditing requirements?

The Office of Financial Aid is bound by the regulatory requirements of federal, state, institutional, and outside agency financial aid programs. We are audited each year by an external accounting firm and the programs/processes are constantly under review by EIU Internal Auditors. In addition, the Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC), conducts an audit of our processing for state programs, every three years.

Community Involvement

What are the most important outreach or public service activities supported by the program?

  • Financial aid nights at local high schools
  • Financial literacy information outreach (e.g. University Foundations and Math)
  • Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) filing information outreach (e.g. Gateway and TRiO)
  • Debut and Orientation financial aid information
  • Charity events sponsored through our professional associations (e.g. Illinois Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, Midwest Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, and National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators)

How do the local community and the region benefit from the program?

The community/region benefits from having local experts provide comprehensive financial aid information and contribute to local/regional charity events.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the external demand for the program.

Section 4: Quality of program outcomes

Assessment and accreditation of academic programs today tend to be more focused on program outcomes than inputs. This criterion focuses on external validations of quality and uses multiple measures to identify exemplary performance and achievements. Both student and faculty outcomes will be relevant for academic programs. Administrative programs are expected to use best practices and provide value to the clienteles served.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Outcomes Assessment

What are the two or three more important measureable outcomes tracked to assess program quality? Does the program conduct an outcomes assessment, and if so, what has been the impact?

(see 2013 Major Assessment Profile)

Best Practices

What are the two or three most effective best practices that the program has implemented? What benefits have been gained from implementing these best practices?

Leveraged packaging: Students are packaged with the appropriate amount of gift aid (grants and scholarships) based on a combination of expected family contribution (EFC) and academic index (high school GPA and ACT composite score). The packaging matrix is developed in conjunction with Noel Levitz and it is based on historical enrollment activity and established enrollment goals.

Coordination of scholarships: A Scholarship Coordinator was hired to help streamline the processing of scholarships on a campus-wide basis. The coordinator has been successful in developing helpful communications and processes to consolidate scholarship operations. Another key benefit is that the coordinator provides a bridge to help students, faculty, and staff with all scholarship activities.

Merit scholarships: Merit scholarships were recommended by Noel Levitz and embraced by Eastern’s administration. These scholarships help to attract bright students to EIU, with the potential to raise the academic profile of the student population over time.

External Recognitions

What external recognitions (e.g., awards, accommodations, professional certifications, references in trade publications) have the program and its staff received in the past three years?

Professional Organizations

Is the program active with any regional, national, or international professional organizations?

ILASFAA – Illinois Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators

- Jerry Alan Donna – V.P. of Senior Public Institutions and Member, Executive Board

- Jenny Stout – Program Committee and Chair, Event Registration

- Teresa Jones – Program Committee, Event Registration

MASFAA – Midwest Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators

- Carol Waldmann, Program Committee

NASFAA – National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators

COSUAA – Coalition of State University Aid Administrators

AVECO - Association of Veterans Education Certifying Officials


Note any presentations, publications, or offices held in the last three years.

(see above)

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the quality of program outcomes.

Section 5: Resources Generated by the Program

Programs may generate resources in a number of ways: enrollments, grants, fundraising, income-producing contracts, ticket sales, and provision of services. Interconnections among programs create implicit cross-subsidies, with some programs being net payers and others being net receivers. Resources in this context need not be financial. Relationships with community colleges, schools and businesses, and government bodies also benefit the university.

Revenues
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
50080-Other Revenue 8,555 9,586 7,864 7,129
 
22B310-Grant-In-Aid Athletics
50020-Fees and Fines 2,203,327 2,157,935 2,109,778 1,983,716
50020-Fees and Fines 344,971 362,862 280,397 265,843
 
22B330-SEDS
50020-Fees and Fines 296,638 274,301 285,911 265,583
50040-Investments and Recovery 79,769 98,380 87,884 85,922
 
22B350-Veterans Services Reporting Fee
50040-Investments and Recovery 1,582 3,957 1,967 3,420
Program Total: 2,934,841 2,907,022 2,773,802 2,611,613
Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Funding Data Pending

Note any special benefits (e.g., personnel support, equipment, permanent improvements) that the program has received in the past three years from its grants and other sponsored programs.

The Office of Financial Aid receives funds from participating in Federal grant programs. The funds are entered into org. 22B340 ‘Indirect Costs-Financial Aid’ and used for help fund non-personnel activities. For example, replacement computer equipment and office renovations are possible because of these funds.

Relationships

How does the program benefit from donor gifts (e.g., scholarships, endowed chairs)? Does donor support provide a significant percentage of the program’s overall funding?

Donor gifts provide great benefits to students. For the last IBHE reporting year (2011-2012) financial aid totaled over $132 M, with roughly $5.5 M of the awards coming through donor gifts. That is 4.1% of the total financial aid disbursed.

List two or three key relationships that the program maintains with external constituencies (e.g., community colleges, other universities, government bodies). How do these relationships advance the university mission or otherwise benefit the university?

  • Directors of Financial Aid in Illinois meet two times each year to discuss issues of common concern. These meetings help to build the knowledge base of all directors and they also move our individual operations forward. We also strategize about how to best work with the State of Illinois to continue to emphasize the need for financial aid appropriations (MAP Grant).
  • The state, regional, and national financial aid associations provide training, development, and advocacy.
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the resources generated by the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., revenue pass-throughs) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 6: Productivity of the program

Productivity refers to the outcomes and resources generated by the program relative to its size and scope. Productivity measures tend to be quantitative, based on metrics like student credit hour production, degree completions, and number of students or other clientele served, relative to the size of the faculty or staff assigned to the program. A program's productivity can be negatively impacted if its resources are too thinly spread to achieve a critical mass or if its resources are imbalanced relative to program needs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Metrics and Benchmarks

Provide an executive summary of and link to any metrics or benchmarks that the program tracks to measure productivity.

FINANCIAL AID AWARDED (prior year)

Seventy-eight percent of Eastern’s student body received some type of financial assistance in FY 2012 in the form of scholarships, grants, loans, tuition waivers and/or employment, from various federal, state, university, and other programs. Financial aid in FY 2012 totaled $132,984,371 at Eastern, an increase of $6,648,005 or 5% over FY 2011. The percentage breakdown of financial aid sources is as follows: 68% federal, 11% state, 14% institutional, and 7% other.

FAFSA’S PROCESSED (current year)

 

Total   FAFSA’s

Attending   Students

Packaged

FAFSA’s   for 12-13 as of 5/28/2013

18,325

12,074

9,877

FAFSA’s   for 11-12 as of 5/28/2012

17,445

10,289

8,628

Increase/(Decrease)

880

1,785

1,249

Percent           

5%

17%

14%

DISBURSEMENTS (current year)

Term

Amount

Students

Fall   2012

$58,927,073

8,136

Spring   2013

$54,597,756

7,500

Summer   2013

$558,679

215

Total   2012-2013 (as of 5/28/2013)

$114,083,508

(duplicated)15,851

OTHER (current year and next year)

Produced Estimated Award Letters for newly admitted student who were in verification in the 13-14 academic year. On May 14, 2013, 932 letters had been produced, 168 packaged, 65 students canceled (decided not to attend), and 44% deposited (roughly 74 students).

The latest draft Cohort Default Rate (CDR) is 5.2%. This is based on students who attended EIU for a defined period of time and then defaulted on their loans while in repayment.

Actively participated in Noel Levitz (NL) Consulting for retention, recruitment and marketing, and the Enrollment and Revenue Management System (ERMS).

Packaged financial aid using the Noel Levitz leveraged packaging system for a second year in a row.

Implemented and incorporated the following new awards into the awarding/packaging processes: Commitment to Excellence I, II, III, Transfer Academic Excellence I, II, and the Panther Promise Tuition Waiver.

Assisted in restructuring the Presidential Scholars Award and the Honors Award to be more effective for the Honors College.

Developed a plan and process for communicating about available Grant-In-Aid resources to the awarding departments, to help with them with recruitment efforts.

Scholarship Activities:

  • Consolidation/coordination of campus-wide scholarship activities.
  • Redesigned, refreshed, and enhanced the functionality of the EIU Scholarship Search Engine. The website now includes 579 scholarships, featured scholarships, scholarship stories, donor stories, scholarship history, merit scholarship calculator, scholarship tips, outside scholarship resource information and more.  
  • Developed and trained faculty/staff on the electronic Scholarship Verification Form (SVF) system. The SVF system was recognized at the Ellucian Conference for an honorable mention for effective use of Banner Workflow.
  • Provided 2200 merit scholarships certificates to roughly 530 high schools. President Perry, along with staff from Admissions, Financial Aid, Honors College, and the VPAA Office presented the awards in local high schools.

Successfully transition the Satisfactory Academic Progress processes from the VPSA Office to the Office of Financial Aid. This included changing the processes and related materials to include a new federally required component, where students filing a SAP Appeal must meet with an Academic Advisor.

Produced a series of printed-based materials to aid in recruitment: Merit Scholarship Flyer, Financial Aid Information Brochure, Scholarships for Freshmen Booklet, and Scholarships for Transfer Students Booklet.

Staff Productivity

What initiatives has the program implemented to enhance staff productivity (e.g., access to training, workflow improvements)? Briefly describe the costs and benefits of these initiatives.

(see above)

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the productivity of the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., accreditation requirements, curricular changes, program restructuring) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 7: Costs associated with the program

Program analysis will be tied to the university's financial ledgers. A program by definition uses university resources, and tying to the accounting system helps ensure that no programs are overlooked in the analysis. Metrics in this criterion are used to identify all of the costs of delivering the program. Many of these costs are direct, but some may be implicit or indirect costs not directly associated with any financial payment. Programs may also be drivers of efficiencies that can help reduce the costs of delivering other programs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Expenditures
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
70060-Waivers 4,734,408 3,991,642 5,956,777 6,479,225
 
12B300-Financial Aid and Scholarships
60010-Administrative 259,022 260,982 273,625 288,337
60020-Civil Service 484,874 470,237 549,942 575,176
60040-Graduate Assistants 8,760 9,240 10,770 10,800
60050-Student Employees 664 718 693 499
70020-Contractual Services 23,625 10,999 15,530 16,138
70030-Commodities 8,846 1,384 - 3,623
70040-Capital Expenditures 2,647 2,704 - -
70050-Travel 6,409 - - -
Total: 794,847 756,264 850,560 894,573
 
12B310-Access to Education Scholarship
60010-Administrative - 40,000 45,400 45,854
70070-Other Expenses 194,832 676,670 1,444,304 1,418,588
Total: 194,832 716,670 1,489,704 1,464,442
60050-Student Employees 179,924 21,625 61,516 8,993
 
12B330-Commitment to Excellence Awards
70070-Other Expenses - - 701,250 1,762,250
70070-Other Expenses - - 62,921 44,605
 
12B350-Transfer Academic Excellence
70070-Other Expenses - - - 538,000
70020-Contractual Services 62 64 72 59
70070-Other Expenses 6,498 695 15,175 12,214
Total: 6,560 759 15,247 12,273
 
22B310-Grant-In-Aid Athletics
70020-Contractual Services 16,608 16,525 16,185 15,823
70060-Waivers 36,742 29,664 32,958 30,750
70070-Other Expenses 2,230,948 2,312,094 1,797,465 1,839,702
Total: 2,284,298 2,358,283 1,846,608 1,886,275
70020-Contractual Services 2,803 2,587 2,721 2,103
70060-Waivers 5,744 4,995 4,359 4,172
70070-Other Expenses 341,623 388,951 307,923 205,938
Total: 350,170 396,533 315,003 212,213
 
22B330-SEDS
70020-Contractual Services 1,349 2,225 2,057 2,144
70060-Waivers 4,984 3,766 4,471 4,066
70070-Other Expenses 294,399 306,357 280,644 179,542
Total: 300,732 312,348 287,173 185,753
60010-Administrative - - 23,354 -
60020-Civil Service - 8,488 2,404 1,719
70020-Contractual Services - 9,516 21,997 58,227
70030-Commodities - 9,156 12,632 8,476
70040-Capital Expenditures - 6,606 1,504 54,720
70050-Travel - 10,397 16,493 13,878
Total: - 44,163 78,384 137,019
Program Total: 8,845,772 8,598,288 11,665,144 13,625,622
Staffing
12B300 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 15.00 19.50 19.00 21.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 3.50 4.50 4.00 4.00
Civil Service 0.00 11.50 14.00 15.00 16.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12B310 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12B320 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 35.00 38.00 30.00 7.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 35.00 38.00 30.00 7.00
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the costs associated with the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., expenditures made centrally or externally, expenditures made on behalf of other units) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 8: Program impact on university mission

This criterion may be considered a catch-all for relevant information not covered elsewhere. It focuses on reasons why a program should be maintained or strengthened, the essentiality of the program to the university and its mission, the contributions that the program makes to other programs' successes, and the benefits that the university receives from having the program. The university's vision calls for making personal connections and having a global reach and impact, and programs may have unique aspects that contribute to this vision.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Distinctive and Unique Aspects

How does the program seek to distinguish itself from similar programs at other institutions?

We are distinguished from others programs at other institutions by our merit scholarship structure for both new freshman and new transfer students. We also offer the Panther Promise Tuition Waiver to new incoming students who fall into a specific household income range.  We offer personalized attention to the various needs of students and families.

Note any unique and/or essential contributions that the program makes to the university.

The essential contribution that the Office of Financial Aid makes to the university is to help students with access and affordability.

Program-specific Metrics (optional)

Provide any program-specific metrics that help to document program contributions or program quality. Examples of some commonly used program-specific metrics may be found here.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program impact on the university mission.

Section 9: Future opportunities for the program

No program has all the resources it wants or needs, and new or reallocated funds are scarce. This criterion provides an opportunity analysis to identify new and innovative ideas to promote a sustainable academic and financial future for the university. Identifiable trends in student demographics and interests, technological developments, and partnerships with businesses, schools, alumni, and donors are just a few possible avenues for future opportunities. Many of the opportunities that programs identify will tie back to the university's strategic plan, which specifies six key areas that we want to enhance or strengthen.

Planning Limit all responses to 300 words

Provide a link to or listing of the program’s goals and/or strategic plan.

PROPOSED FY14 GOALS (aligning with the Presidential Priorities below)

1-Academic Excellence

2-Global Competition and Changing Demographics

3-Emerging Technologies

4-Campus and Community Life

5-Financial Sustainability

6-Marketing and Communication

Work with ITS and other campus partners to develop and utilize an EIU designed enrollment and revenue management system to help increase enrollment and retention. (1) (5)

Increase the resources available for students. (2) (5)

Continue to provide input and resources for financial literacy efforts on campus. (2) (4) (5)

Continue to update the look and feel of the Office of Financial Aid. (4)

Continue to work toward automation of summer financial aid processing. (2) (3)

Expand office space to reduce the staff to square footage ratio. (It is likely that Student Health Insurance will be moving within the next year, freeing up critical space.) (4)

What role will the program have in the implementation of the university’s strategic plan (provide link to strategic plan)?

(see above)

Opportunities Limit all responses to 500 words

In the next two or three years, what best practices, improvements in operations, or other opportunities to advance the university’s mission are likely to be implemented?

  • The procurement of the Banner Document Management System (BDMS) will continue to help streamline financial aid operations and enhance customer service.
  • Continue to work with ITS and other campus partners to develop and utilize an EIU-designed enrollment and revenue management system, to help increase enrollment and retention.
  • Increase the financial aid resources available to students.
  • Continue to provide input and resources for financial literacy efforts on campus.
  • Continue to update the look and feel of the Office of Financial Aid.
  • Continue to provide training and development for optimum student service. 
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand future opportunities for the program.