Eastern Illinois University Logo
Program Analysis |

Psychology

Program List

Section 1: History & Relevance

This criterion shows how the program is aligned with the university mission:

Eastern Illinois University is a public comprehensive university that offers superior, accessible undergraduate and graduate education. Students learn the methods and results of free and rigorous inquiry in the arts, humanities, sciences, and professions, guided by a faculty known for its excellence in teaching, research, creative activity, and service. The university community is committed to diversity and inclusion and fosters opportunities for student- faculty scholarship and applied learning experiences within a student- centered campus culture. Throughout their education, students refine their abilities to reason and to communicate clearly so as to become responsible citizens and leaders.

The university mission statement sets standards and expectations for programs. Programs will vary in their purposes, clienteles, and methodologies, but all programs are expected to support the university's mission in some way and achieve its stated expectations of excellence. The pattern of achievements and expectations is different for a mature program than a nascent one, so program history is relevant.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Program Mission

What is the program’s mission statement or statement of purpose? Why does the program exist?

 The Department of Psychology is concerned with the application of psychological theory, methodology, and empirical findings to the study of behavior and mental processes. The Department provides instruction to undergraduate and graduate students who are either Psychology majors or enrolled in Psychology courses. The Department will provide an appropriate number and variety of courses for students majoring in psychology leading to the bachelor's degree, master's degree, or specialist's degree as well as service courses for students in other disciplines.

The Department provides opportunities for students to explore careers in psychology by encouraging undergraduate student research and field placements. In order to enhance these student opportunities, the Department will support faculty research and service in the diverse areas of psychology.

The Department of Psychology uses its human, fiscal, and physical resources to provide a quality learning environment for its undergraduate and graduate students. Qualified faculty challenge and inspire students in modern, well-equipped classrooms and laboratories. Department faculty strengthen their understanding of their areas of study through research and scholarly activity, and they provide services consistent with the mission of the University to students and others in the University's service region.


How does the program mission align with the university mission?

Psychology is treated as a natural science, a social science, and a profession. The undergraduate curriculum in the Psychology Department is designed to prepare students for graduate school, for careers, and for lifelong learning. At the core of the curriculum is a set of carefully selected required courses that enable students to master basic psychological principles, theories, and methods. Students fulfill their departmental graduation requirements by taking the required core courses, choosing courses within several content areas, and selecting elective courses from all the content area courses in psychology.

In addition the Psychology Department offers two graduate programs: Master of Arts in Clinical Psychology and Specialist Degree in School Psychology. These programs offer training for entry level positions in professional psychology. Both programs are fully approved and accredited. While primary responsibility for the Clinical Psychology and School Psychology programs resides with the respective core faculty, graduate students may take courses and conduct thesis research with any member of the faculty.

Services Provided

Whom does the program serve?

Over 450 undergraduates majoring in psychology; over 200 psychology minors; approximately 50 graduate students, and also undergraduates taking gen ed courses, as well as service to other programs (e.g., CDS, education).


What are the services provided? How do these services align with the university mission and program mission?

Undergraduate program, two minors, two graduate programs, Psychology Clinic, assessment services. All academic programs are accessible and offer superior preparation. All programs are rigorous, invite and stimulate scientific and critical thinking, inquiry and personal development. Diversity is supported and celebrated. Students are encouraged to be good citizens, and to communicate clearly and effectively.

Program History

Describe the program’s origins (e.g. year established, purpose, expectations).

Psychology professors at Eastern have had advanced degrees in Psychology, at least, as far back as the 1920s (e.g., Emma Reinhardt, the first woman to receive her Ph.D in Education from the University of Illinois in 1927). Because all students who graduated from Eastern prior to the early 1950s were studying to become teachers, the emphasis in psychology courses was on how psychology applied to teaching. For many years, Psychology at EIU was considered part of the Education Department, and courses were listed in the catalog under the Education program. Dr. Donald A. Rosthschild (1934-1967 at EIU) was the first to offer a “psychology” class at Eastern. On February 14th, 1963, Eastern’s President, Dr. Quincy V. Doudna, announced that a new department of psychology would become operational on September 15th of that year. A year later, Psychology appeared as a separate department in the University’s catalog, with Dr. Rothschild as Chair, and faculty members Dr. Arthur J. Looby and Dr. Henry A. Stackhouse.  A year after that, in the 1965-66 academic year, Dr. Harold G. Coe and Dr. Francis E. Summers joined the department. The department continued to grow steadily to today’s number of approximately 20 tenured/tenure track faculty members. And, psychology remains among one of the most popular majors at Eastern.


How has the unit changed or adapted over time?

Since inception, the Department has added graduate programs, updated those programs over the years as needed, updated the vibrant undergraduate program over the years, added an undergraduate internship program, added a neuroscience minor, and maintained high quality faculty who are committed to the needs of students. In short, all programs have changes to the needs are they occur, often ahead of the curve.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program’s history and relevance to university mission.

Section 2: Internal demand for the program

No single program can achieve the university's mission on its own, and this criterion captures the interconnections among programs. Academic programs provide students with general education courses, foundation and principles courses, and specialized course(s) in support of other programs. Administrative programs may serve a variety of internal clientele, and the choice between internally or externally provided services may be relevant in some cases.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Enrollment Data

Provide data showing the four-year trend in the number of majors, minors, options, and concentrations.

Program Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014
Clinical Psychology (Degree Program 1) 21 27 32 24 24
Psychology (Degree Program 1) 436 454 458 445 425
School Psychology (Degree Program 1) 23 21 24 24 26
Communication Studies (Degree Program 2) 1
Family & Consumer Sciences (Degree Program 2) 1
Foreign Languages (Degree Program 2) 1 1
Health Studies (Degree Program 2) 1
Philosophy (Degree Program 2) 1
Political Science (Degree Program 2) 1
Sociology (Degree Program 2) 1 2 1 4
Clinical Psychology (Major 1) 21 27 32 24 24
PSY: General Applied (Major 1) 1
PSY: Scientific (Major 1) 1
Psychology (Major 1) 435 454 457 445 425
School Psychology (Major 1) 23 21 24 24 26
CMN: Interpersonal Communication (Major 2) 1
FCS: Dietetics (Major 2) 1
FLG: German Sel I (Major 2) 1
FLG: Spanish Sel I (Major 2) 1
HST: Community Health (Major 2) 1
Philosophy (Major 2) 1
Political Science (Major 2) 1
Sociology (Major 2) 1 2 1 4
Advertising (Minor 1) 1 1 1
Africana Studies (Minor 1) 1 1
African-American Studies (Minor 1) 2 2
Anthropology (Minor 1) 2 2 1 1 2
Art (Minor 1) 4 5 1
Biological Sciences (Minor 1) 9 6 5 8 5
Broadcast Meteorology (Minor 1) 1
Business Administration (Minor 1) 13 16 10 11 13
Chemistry (Minor 1) 1 2
Communication Studies (Minor 1) 3 6 5 2 2
Community Health (Minor 1) 2 4 5 8 5
Creative Writing (Minor 1) 2 2 1 1 2
Criminology (Minor 1) 34 38 41 39 30
Economics (Minor 1) 1 1
English (Minor 1) 7 2 3 3 4
Entrepreneurship (Minor 1) 1 2
Family and Consumer Sciences (Minor 1) 19 19 16 24 23
Film Studies (Minor 1) 1 1
FLG: French (Minor 1) 1 1 1
FLG: German (Minor 1) 1 1
FLG: Spanish (Minor 1) 10 7 12 17 12
Health Communication (Minor 1) 1 1 3 3 2
History (Minor 1) 4 1
HST: Teacher Certification (Minor 1) 1
Journalism (Minor 1) 2 1 1 1
Kinesiology and Sports Studies (Minor 1) 1 2 4 3
Management Information Systems (Minor 1) 1
Mathematics (Minor 1) 2 1 1 2
Military Science (Minor 1) 1 1 1 1
Music (Minor 1) 3 3 3 2 1
Neuroscience (Minor 1) 2 8 10 9 9
Philosophy (Minor 1) 2 3 1 3
Political Science (Minor 1) 2 1
Pre-Law Studies (Minor 1) 4 4 5 5 6
Professional Writing (Minor 1) 1 1
Public Relations (Minor 1) 1
Religious Studies (Minor 1) 2 3 2 3
Sociology (Minor 1) 44 45 46 58 42
Studio Art (Minor 1) 2 5 7 12 15
Theatre Arts (Minor 1) 1
Women's Studies (Minor 1) 2 1 5 3 3
African-American Studies (Minor 2) 1 1
Anthropology (Minor 2) 1
Art (Minor 2) 2 1
Biological Sciences (Minor 2) 1 2 4 1 1
Business Administration (Minor 2) 1 2 3
Chemistry (Minor 2) 1 1
Communication Studies (Minor 2) 1
Community Health (Minor 2) 1 2 1
Criminology (Minor 2) 2 4 4 8 7
Entrepreneurship (Minor 2) 1
Family and Consumer Sciences (Minor 2) 2 2 1 1 4
FLG: Spanish (Minor 2) 1 1 1
Latin American Studies (Minor 2) 1 1 1
Medieval Studies (Minor 2) 1
Military Science (Minor 2) 1 1
Neuroscience (Minor 2) 1 3 1 2
Philosophy (Minor 2) 3 2
Political Science (Minor 2) 1 1
Pre-Law Studies (Minor 2) 4 1 1 2 1
Professional Writing (Minor 2) 1
Religious Studies (Minor 2) 1
Sociology (Minor 2) 6 1 7 6 10
Women's Studies (Minor 2) 2 2 2 1
Biological Sciences (Minor 3) 1
Criminology (Minor 3) 1
Family and Consumer Sciences (Minor 3) 1
Neuroscience (Minor 3) 1
Political Science (Minor 3) 1 1

Provide data showing the four-year trend in student credit hour (SCH) production, percent of SCHs that are general education, and percent of SCHs that are taught to non-majors.

Program FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
Total SCHs 13,581 13,930 13,156 13,895 12,919
% of SCHs that are general education 26% 25% 22% 20% 17%
% of SCHs taken by non majors 48% 50% 48% 48% 47%

What elements of the program’s curriculum are offered specifically to support other academic majors, minors, options, and concentrations?

One graduate course supports gerontology program; multiple undergraduate courses support other undergraduate programs, e.g., CDS, FCS, education, nursing, sociology, political science.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the internal demand for the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., curriculum changes made by another program) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 3: External demand for the program

The external demands for programs stem from a number of sources: students and their families, employers and business partners, alumni, donors and other friends of the university, and the general citizenry. The establishing legislation for the university requires it to offer courses of instruction, conduct research, and offer public services. The Illinois Board of Higher Education's Public Agenda for Illinois Higher Education establishes expectations for increasing educational attainment, ensuring college affordability, addressing workforce needs, and enhancing economic development.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Employment Opportunities

List relevant data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Outlook Handbook, the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) New Graduate Salary Survey, and the EIU Career Services Annual Report.

Psychologists (including school) earn a median income of $68,000 per year.

Master's level mental health counselors earn a median income of $40,000 per year.

Health educators (BA level) earn a median income of $46,000 per year. There are many other similar BA level position (e.g., case manager) which regularly employ Psych graduates (median incomes are similar).

All of the above are listed as growing faster than normal in the Occupational Outlook Handbook.

In EIU's Career Services Annual Report (2012), Psych grads are showed as 92% employed.

External Expectations

Is the program accredited or approved by a recognized external agency or otherwise certified to meet established professional standards? Provide an executive summary of and link to the program’s most recent accreditation or certification report, if available.

Two programs are not. The SSP program is certified by NASP. Currently it has full certification. They don't issue an executive summary.


Is the program required to meet any regulatory or legal requirements? Is the program subject to any special auditing requirements?

No regulatory or other requirements.

Community Involvement

What are the most important outreach or public service activities supported by the program?

Psychological services clinic. In addition, interns, undergraute and graduate, help staff multiple local agencies and school districts.


How do the local community and the region benefit from the program?

We prepared student in above. In addition, the psychological services clinic offer psychological assessments (including psycho-educational) and psychotherapeutic services.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the external demand for the program.

Section 4: Quality of program outcomes

Assessment and accreditation of academic programs today tend to be more focused on program outcomes than inputs. This criterion focuses on external validations of quality and uses multiple measures to identify exemplary performance and achievements. Both student and faculty outcomes will be relevant for academic programs. Administrative programs are expected to use best practices and provide value to the clienteles served.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Academic Quality Measures

Psychology (B.A.)

Significant Achievements that Document Quality/Improvement

Significant achievements that document support of VPAA and/or University goals

Integrative Learning Opportunities

Student Research/creative Activity

Faculty-student collaboration

Strategies to improve P-16 teaching and learning

External Partnerships

Pass rates on any professional/ occupational licensure exams

Faculty Achievements

Student Achievements

Clinical Psychology (M.A.)

Significant Achievements that Document Quality/Improvement

Significant achievements that document support of VPAA and/or University goals

Integrative Learning Opportunities

Student Research/creative Activity

Faculty-student collaboration

Strategies to improve P-16 teaching and learning

External Partnerships

Pass rates on any professional/ occupational licensure exams

Faculty Achievements

Student Achievements

Specialist in School Psychology

Significant Achievements that Document Quality/Improvement

Significant achievements that document support of VPAA and/or University goals

Integrative Learning Opportunities

Student Research/creative Activity

Faculty-student collaboration

Strategies to improve P-16 teaching and learning

External Partnerships

Pass rates on any professional/ occupational licensure exams

Faculty Achievements

Student Achievements

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the quality of program outcomes.

Section 5: Resources Generated by the Program

Programs may generate resources in a number of ways: enrollments, grants, fundraising, income-producing contracts, ticket sales, and provision of services. Interconnections among programs create implicit cross-subsidies, with some programs being net payers and others being net receivers. Resources in this context need not be financial. Relationships with community colleges, schools and businesses, and government bodies also benefit the university.

Revenues
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
50020-Fees and Fines 1,560 1,620 1,830 1,790
 
223902-Psychology Research Methods
50020-Fees and Fines 2,131 1,989 2,315 2,332
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 615 200 0 400
 
223904-Integrative Learning Award Psych
50080-Other Revenue 2,500 0 0 0
Program Total: 6,806 3,809 4,145 4,522
Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Funding Data Pending

Note any special benefits (e.g., personnel support, equipment, permanent improvements) that the program has received in the past three years from its grants and other sponsored programs.

None from grants, but significant improvements to research labs, euipment, and teaching resources via TRM funds.

Relationships

How does the program benefit from donor gifts (e.g., scholarships, endowed chairs)? Does donor support provide a significant percentage of the program’s overall funding?

Gifts are primarily used for student scholarships and awards. Gifts are also used to support undergraduate research and student travel to conferences.

List two or three key relationships that the program maintains with external constituencies (e.g., community colleges, other universities, government bodies). How do these relationships advance the university mission or otherwise benefit the university?

Lakeland and Parkland Colleges. These and other community colleges throughout the state provide us with a significant propostion of our undergraduate majors.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the resources generated by the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., revenue pass-throughs) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 6: Productivity of the program

Productivity refers to the outcomes and resources generated by the program relative to its size and scope. Productivity measures tend to be quantitative, based on metrics like student credit hour production, degree completions, and number of students or other clientele served, relative to the size of the faculty or staff assigned to the program. A program's productivity can be negatively impacted if its resources are too thinly spread to achieve a critical mass or if its resources are imbalanced relative to program needs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Student Credit Hours
PROGRAM FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
Total SCHs 13,581 13,930 13,156 13,895 12,919
Breakdown by student major
Program majors 7,124 7,013 6,876 7,293 6,814
Other majors in college 1,531 1,623 1,563 1,683 1,672
Majors in other colleges 3,914 4,431 4,101 4,382 3,906
Undeclared/other 1,012 863 616 537 527
Breakdown by course level
General Education 3,591 3,444 2,835 2,718 2,208
Lower Division 4,481 4,335 3,716 3,694 3,148
Upper Division 7,615 8,195 8,225 8,811 8,475
Mixed 123 108 0 0 0
Graduate 1,362 1,292 1,215 1,390 1,296
Breakdown by term
Fall 6,565 6,640 6,233 6,512 6,065
Spring 5,888 6,315 5,758 6,226 5,618
Summer 1,128 975 1,165 1,157 1,236
Breakdown by location
On-campus 11,784 12,058 10,837 11,324 10,306
SCE/off-campus 1,797 1,872 2,319 2,571 2,613
Breakdown by tech usage
Some Technology Required 5,048 5,333 4,536 4,363 4,198
Technology Knowledge Required 3,828 4,453 3,828 4,021 3,575
Technology Delivered 1,089 1,353 1,566 2,211 2,271
Other 3,616 2,791 3,226 3,300 2,875
Breakdown by writing intensiveness
Writing Centered 0 0 0 0 0
Writing Intensive 835 841 782 873 863
Other 12,746 13,089 12,374 13,022 12,056

PROGRAM FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Average SCHs per faculty instructional credit unit 21 24 24 23 23
Average SCHs per faculty credit unit 19 22 22 21 20
Faculty costs per student credit hour TBD 112 116 104 111
Personnel costs per student credit hour TBD 11 10 10 11
Ledger-1 program costs per student credit hour TBD 127 138 124 132
Degrees Conferred
PROGRAM FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Number of degrees conferred 140 142 146 145 146
Breakdown by level
Undergraduate 128 124 129 129 133
Graduate 12 18 17 16 13
Number of certifications awarded

* For the Science with Teacher Certification it is included with Biology
** For the Social Science with Teacher Certification it is included in History
Class Size For academic programs: Data excluding independent study, independent research, internships, and other individualized curricula.
For Colleges: Summary-level data

PROGRAM FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Average class size 31.76 34.42 31.27 35.70 26.13
Breakdown by level
Undergraduate 56 55 55 60 38
Graduate 8 8 8 10 8
Post Baccalaureate 1 1 1 1 1
Percent of 1000–2999 courses with fewer than 24 students 0% 0% 25% 0% 50%
Percent of 3000–4749 courses with fewer than 15 students 20% 16% 28% 28% 42%
Percent of 4750–4999 courses with fewer than 10 students 100% 67%
Percent of 5000 and above courses with fewer than 8 students 8% 0% 21% 0% 0%
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the productivity of the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., accreditation requirements, curricular changes, program restructuring) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 7: Costs associated with the program

Program analysis will be tied to the university's financial ledgers. A program by definition uses university resources, and tying to the accounting system helps ensure that no programs are overlooked in the analysis. Metrics in this criterion are used to identify all of the costs of delivering the program. Many of these costs are direct, but some may be implicit or indirect costs not directly associated with any financial payment. Programs may also be drivers of efficiencies that can help reduce the costs of delivering other programs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Expenditures
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
60010-Administrative 106,636 107,969 113,248 114,691
60020-Civil Service 41,272 29,167 29,724 29,280
60030-Faculty 1,549,721 1,519,413 1,433,677 1,423,184
60040-Graduate Assistants 3,600 5,580 5,580 5,580
60050-Student Employees - - - 806
70020-Contractual Services 27,234 32,035 28,642 51,430
70030-Commodities 7,665 12,423 8,066 19,775
70040-Capital Expenditures 20,407 90,102 92,219 27,025
70050-Travel 18,504 20,672 18,535 27,637
Total: 1,775,039 1,817,360 1,729,691 1,699,407
 
123911-CFR Heller FY11
60050-Student Employees 1,254 - - -
70020-Contractual Services 220 - - -
70030-Commodities 374 - - -
Total: 1,848 - - -
70020-Contractual Services 540 102 115 114
70030-Commodities 2,692 1,443 1,424 1,970
Total: 3,232 1,545 1,540 2,084
 
223902-Psychology Research Methods
70020-Contractual Services - - - 253
70030-Commodities 2,254 1,992 2,230 2,234
Total: 2,254 1,992 2,230 2,487
70030-Commodities 1,678 - - -
70040-Capital Expenditures - 822 - -
Total: 1,678 822 - -
Program Total: 1,784,051 1,821,720 1,733,461 1,703,978
Staffing
123900 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 34.50 22.50 20.50 21.00 20.00
Admin/Professional 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Civil Service 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Faculty 21.50 19.50 17.50 18.00 18.00
Unit A 18.50 17.50 15.50 14.00 14.00
Unit B 3.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the costs associated with the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., expenditures made centrally or externally, expenditures made on behalf of other units) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

Section 8: Program impact on university mission

This criterion may be considered a catch-all for relevant information not covered elsewhere. It focuses on reasons why a program should be maintained or strengthened, the essentiality of the program to the university and its mission, the contributions that the program makes to other programs' successes, and the benefits that the university receives from having the program. The university's vision calls for making personal connections and having a global reach and impact, and programs may have unique aspects that contribute to this vision.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Distinctive and Unique Aspects

How does the program seek to distinguish itself from similar programs at other institutions?

Cutting edge curricula that keep pace with change in the field (often ahead of the curve). True dedication and activities in undergraduate research and faculty-student research. Real and vibrant intership programs. In these areas our competitors frequently promise these thing, but don't deliver. In addition, all areas of our field are represented in our program (also infrequent at other institutions).

Note any unique and/or essential contributions that the program makes to the university.

Large presence and commitment undergraduate research; strong undergrad internship program; important grad program in school psychology, fills a statewide need; and psychological services clinic.

 

Program-specific Metrics (optional)

Provide any program-specific metrics that help to document program contributions or program quality. Examples of some commonly used program-specific metrics may be found here.

Consistently recieved level 3 program assessments in all areas and in all programs.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program impact on the university mission.

Section 9: Future opportunities for the program

No program has all the resources it wants or needs, and new or reallocated funds are scarce. This criterion provides an opportunity analysis to identify new and innovative ideas to promote a sustainable academic and financial future for the university. Identifiable trends in student demographics and interests, technological developments, and partnerships with businesses, schools, alumni, and donors are just a few possible avenues for future opportunities. Many of the opportunities that programs identify will tie back to the university's strategic plan, which specifies six key areas that we want to enhance or strengthen.

Planning Limit all responses to 300 words

Provide a link to or listing of the program’s goals and/or strategic plan.

  • Increase and enhance undergraduate research.
  • Add formalized critical thinking and writing components into the undergraduate curriculum (i.e., via new courses and other modifications).
  • Increase enrollments and diversity in the SSP program.
  • Increase and enhance teaching facilities (e.g., classroom modifications and additions, such as an undergraduate research method lab classroom).
  • Increase and enhance lab facilities (e.g., modifications and additions to research labs).
  • Initiate a new MS program in psychological science.

What role will the program have in the implementation of the university’s strategic plan (provide link to strategic plan)?

  • Dept goals are relisted below with the University's strategic plan goals in bold.

 

  • Add formalized critical thinking and writing components into the undergraduate curriculum (i.e., via new courses and other modifications). Academic Excellence - Enhance/improve critical thinking
  • Increase and enhance undergraduate research. Academic Excellence - Enhance/improve critical thinking & Enhance the integrative learning experience for all students
  • Increase enrollments and diversity in the SSP program. Global Competition and Changing Demographics - Diversity
  • Increase and enhance teaching facilities (e.g., classroom modifications and additions, such as an undergraduate research method lab classroom). Academic Excellence - institution that creates a culture of academic rigor.
  • Increase and enhance lab facilities (e.g., modifications and additions to research labs).Academic Excellence - institution that creates a culture of academic rigor.
  • Initiate a new MS program in psychological science. Academic Excellence - institution that creates a culture of academic rigor.
Opportunities Limit all responses to 500 words

What are the program’s two or three most promising opportunities that could help advance the university’s academic mission? Provide an estimate of additional investments or other costs required and additional student credit hours, revenue, or other resources generated.

A neuroscience major jointly with the Biological Sciences Dept. This should attract 40-60 new undergraduate students and it could be accomplished with existing faculty and courses (with one or two new ones).

A new graduate degree (MS) in psychological science. Should attract cohorts of 12, with a total enrollment of 24-30. Will require new courses and two new faculty.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand future opportunities for the program.