Eastern Illinois University Logo
Program Analysis |

CEPS Dean

Program List

Section 1: History & Relevance

This criterion shows how the program is aligned with the university mission:

Eastern Illinois University is a public comprehensive university that offers superior, accessible undergraduate and graduate education. Students learn the methods and results of free and rigorous inquiry in the arts, humanities, sciences, and professions, guided by a faculty known for its excellence in teaching, research, creative activity, and service. The university community is committed to diversity and inclusion and fosters opportunities for student- faculty scholarship and applied learning experiences within a student- centered campus culture. Throughout their education, students refine their abilities to reason and to communicate clearly so as to become responsible citizens and leaders.

The university mission statement sets standards and expectations for programs. Programs will vary in their purposes, clienteles, and methodologies, but all programs are expected to support the university's mission in some way and achieve its stated expectations of excellence. The pattern of achievements and expectations is different for a mature program than a nascent one, so program history is relevant.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Program Mission

What is the program’s mission statement or statement of purpose? Why does the program exist?

 

Our Mission

The mission of the College of Education and Professional Studies (CEPS) at Eastern Illinois University is to provide an educational environment that is conducive to interaction, inquiry, and service. Our goal is to prepare professionals who will advance the intellectual, physical, psychological and social wellbeing of our pluralistic democracy and global society. Offering preparation in varied fields and on multiple levels of study, the College serves a diverse student body at the undergraduate and graduate levels. The College has a reputation for excellence in its programs, strives to hold students to even higher expectations for learning, and is accountable for quality of academic programs and the assessment of learning. The Dean’s Office serves as the administrative center for the College of Education and Professional Studies and serves students from all four academic colleges.


How does the program mission align with the university mission?

The College of Education and Professional Studies Mission Statement is in alignment with the EIU Mission Statement.

Services Provided

Whom does the program serve?

 

Services Provided

The Dean’s Office provides services for staff, faculty, students, alumni, and friends of the college. Our activities focus on planning, management and oversight of college initiatives; encouragement for initiatives undertaken within individual academic units and outreach programs; graduation certification for undergraduate students; licensure entitlement for all educator preparation programs (current students and alumni in all four academic colleges); alumni re-engagement through the Alumni Board; fundraising activities and stewardship through the Philanthropy Board; scholarship awards; representation on university committees and advisory boards; summer school planning and development; resting place for student and faculty concerns; college budgeting; and college personnel administration.    

The Dean’s Office provides direction and support for the accreditation of all teacher education programs at EIU through COTE, the governing body for teacher education at EIU. COTE sets policy and reviews/approves curricular matters pertaining to all initial and advanced teacher education programs.


What are the services provided? How do these services align with the university mission and program mission?

See previous answer.

Program History

Describe the program’s origins (e.g. year established, purpose, expectations).

 

College History 

Eastern Illinois University was founded as a normal school to prepare teachers and administrators. This remains as a strong feature of our college. The current configuration for the College of Education and Professional Studies occurred in 1993. CEPS academic units include the Departments of Counseling and Student Development; Early Childhood, Elementary and Middle Level Education; Educational Leadership; Health Studies; Kinesiology and Sports Studies; Recreation Administration; Secondary Education and Foundations; Special Education; Student Teaching and Clinical Experiences; as well as the Instructional Technology Center. Eight departments offer undergraduate and/or graduate programs as well as minors.

The Dean’s Office strives to ensure that the educational, programmatic, and service needs of our students, faculty, alumni, and the greater community are met. Reconnecting with alumni and working with current and new donors has been a high priority to ensure the funds are available for student and faculty initiatives. New scholarship support for short term faculty led study abroad programs has made those programs more accessible to a wider audience. Meetings are held with the Administrative Council bi-weekly and the immediate office staff monthly.


How has the unit changed or adapted over time?

See previous answer.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program’s history and relevance to university mission.

Section 2: Internal demand for the program

No single program can achieve the university's mission on its own, and this criterion captures the interconnections among programs. Academic programs provide students with general education courses, foundation and principles courses, and specialized course(s) in support of other programs. Administrative programs may serve a variety of internal clientele, and the choice between internally or externally provided services may be relevant in some cases.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Enrollment Data

Provide data showing the four-year trend in the number of majors, minors, options, and concentrations.

Program Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014

Provide data showing the four-year trend in student credit hour (SCH) production, percent of SCHs that are general education, and percent of SCHs that are taught to non-majors.

Program FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
Total SCHs 0 0 0 0 0
% of SCHs that are general education
% of SCHs taken by non majors

What elements of the program’s curriculum are offered specifically to support other academic majors, minors, options, and concentrations?

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the internal demand for the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., curriculum changes made by another program) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

 

Internal Demands for Service

The Dean’s Office oversees the following:

  • college budget.
  • evaluation of Unit A and B faculty portfolios.
  • hiring and training of faculty, staff, and chairs.
  • identification and procurement of private support for college and departmental initiatives.
  • preparation of reports and information requests.
  • college curriculum committee approval processes.
  • COTE processes.
  • curriculum review and development across all EIU teacher education programs.
  • educator licensure entitlement for all four academic colleges.
  • undergraduate graduation certification.
  • mediation of personnel and student concerns.
  • facilitation of student related academic requests (changing majors).
  • CEPS Alumni Board and Philanthropy Board.
  • CEPS summer school offerings.
  • representation at university committees and boards.
  • preparation of grant proposals to support college programs.
  • accreditation and reaccreditation for academic programs.
  • telefund and other awards for faculty and students which includes funds for scholarships and research projects.
  • graduate assistantships focused on technology, student support, and constituent relations.

The Dean’s Office has numerous interactions with CEPS’s 166 faculty and staff on a weekly basis via personal appointments, phone calls, e-mails, or meetings. CEPS’s students, faculty, advisors, prospective students, parents, and other EIU staff members are served by our graduation certification staff via e-mails, phone calls, drop-in appointments with an average of 15,000 contacts per year.

 

Educator licensure questions have increased with the new state regulations. Routinely, this positon deals with over 5200 phone calls, e-mails, walk-in and scheduled appointments yearly with students, alumni, and administrators. In addition, meetings are held for all teacher education candidates monthly.

 

The Instructional Technology Center (ITC) serves numerous individuals. On a yearly basis, over 80,000 individuals use the services of this facility. The services include technology assistance, Uniprint, lamination, bulletin board materials, and checkout of equipment (video, audio, laptops, cameras, netbook and iPad carts). The ITC provides Classroom Technology Proficiencies for between 600 and 800 students yearly.      

Section 3: External demand for the program

The external demands for programs stem from a number of sources: students and their families, employers and business partners, alumni, donors and other friends of the university, and the general citizenry. The establishing legislation for the university requires it to offer courses of instruction, conduct research, and offer public services. The Illinois Board of Higher Education's Public Agenda for Illinois Higher Education establishes expectations for increasing educational attainment, ensuring college affordability, addressing workforce needs, and enhancing economic development.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Employment Opportunities

List relevant data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Outlook Handbook, the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) New Graduate Salary Survey, and the EIU Career Services Annual Report.

External Expectations

Is the program accredited or approved by a recognized external agency or otherwise certified to meet established professional standards? Provide an executive summary of and link to the program’s most recent accreditation or certification report, if available.


Is the program required to meet any regulatory or legal requirements? Is the program subject to any special auditing requirements?

Community Involvement

What are the most important outreach or public service activities supported by the program?


How do the local community and the region benefit from the program?

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the external demand for the program.

 

External Expectations and Community Involvement

CEPS outreach efforts extend beyond the university to the local community, ISBE, and the P-12 districts across Illinois. A strategic effort has been made to re-engage and recognize CEPS alumni and donors. Examples include:

  • establishment of the CEPS Alumni Board to help re-engage our alumni.
  • establishment of the CEPS Philanthropy Board to assist in identifying potential donors and friends for the college.
  • creation of a yearly alumni publication Connections which is now sent to over 28,500 alumni and friends of CEPS. Endowment donors and friends receive a personalized copy from the Dean.
  • quarterly publication of the electronic newsletter The Chat Room which is sent to 12,500 alumni and friends of CEPS.
  • creation of the annual CEPS Alumni Awards Program.
  • recognize every gift to the CEPS or any department on a weekly basis with a personal thank you note from the Dean.
  • recognize each new endowment with a special token of appreciation.
  • annual stewardship of local endowment donors with a short reception and tickets to the “Call to Duty Concert.”
  • Establishment of the CEPS Winetasting Fundraiser where $7000 was raised in 2011 and $17,000 was raised in 2013. All funds raised went to support CEPS initiatives.
  • strategic support for EIU’s faculty-staff campaign with a 72% participation rate in 2012 and an 82% participation rate in 2013.
  • phone calls, luncheons, and/or dinners with donors and their scholarship winners or potential donors.
  • nomination of alumni and/or friends of CEPS for numerous campus award programs as well as community sponsored awards.
  • participation in numerous events hosted by other entities at EIU: Homecoming Tent, Legacy Celebration; Alumni Association and Athletics sponsored functions.
  • requests for EIU practicum students, student teachers, and alumni from teachers and administrators in school districts across Illinois.
  • requests from school districts and regional offices of education to establish both bachelor’s and master’s level cohorts inside and outside our service area.
  • requests from ISBE for teacher education data and/or information on a routine basis.
  • facilitate requests for education related volunteer requests with local school districts.

Section 4: Quality of program outcomes

Assessment and accreditation of academic programs today tend to be more focused on program outcomes than inputs. This criterion focuses on external validations of quality and uses multiple measures to identify exemplary performance and achievements. Both student and faculty outcomes will be relevant for academic programs. Administrative programs are expected to use best practices and provide value to the clienteles served.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments or data sources to help the reader understand the quality of program outcomes.

 

Ensuring Quality Academic Programing

CEPS sustains and creates partnerships between faculty, students and community agencies, including business, industry and P-12 schools. Administration, faculty and staff are committed to design and implement programs that reflect our changing society. All students participate in field-based experiences that bridge the gap between theory and practice. Students are prepared to be leaders in their professions and can integrate technology effectively and responsibly in both their personal and professional lives. Graduates demonstrate respect for the dignity of individuals because they have seen it modeled and integrated in their college experience.

  • All educator preparation programs at EIU are accredited by NCATE – National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, approved by their respective SPA, as well as being approved by ISBE – Illinois State Board of Education.
  • Other academic programs in CEPS are recognized by their respective accreditors: CAATE - Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education; CAHEA - Committee on Allied Health Education and Accreditation; CACREP - Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Programs; NRPA/AALR -National Recreation and Parks Association /American Association for Leisure and Recreation; CASS - College Association of Student Services; and SOPHE/SABPAC/AAHE - Society for Public Health Education.
  • Fully fund all accreditation costs in CEPS including yearly fees and all costs associated with site team visits to EIU.
  • Support accredited programs by purchasing necessary equipment.
  • Assist with the IBHE program reviews noting the areas of strengths as well as the areas for change/improvement.
  • Assist with the preparation of IBHE documents for new programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels.
  • Prepare Title II Report, AACTE-PEDS Report, and annual NCATE Report.
  • Maintain and disseminate assessment data for teacher education programs through LiveText.
  • Responsible for teacher education across all four academic colleges.
  • Prepare the ISBE data tables for Annual Program Reports.
  • Submit all Annual Program Reports to ISBE.
  • Provide data to departments for the multiple reports completed on a yearly basis.
  • Support the efforts of departments in developing their applications for EIU’s Graduate School First Choice Designation.
  • Support the CAA Learning Goal Analysis efforts.
  • Encourage departments to engage in the process to have their graduate programs designated as First Choice.

Section 5: Resources Generated by the Program

Programs may generate resources in a number of ways: enrollments, grants, fundraising, income-producing contracts, ticket sales, and provision of services. Interconnections among programs create implicit cross-subsidies, with some programs being net payers and others being net receivers. Resources in this context need not be financial. Relationships with community colleges, schools and businesses, and government bodies also benefit the university.

Revenues
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 3,625 2,280 75 5
 
222002-CEPS Post-Baccalaureate Fee
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 1,905 1,605 1,490 1,015
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 2,960 3,022 1,988 1,014
 
222004-Center For Educational Studies
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 4,125 4,125 4,000 5,030
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 0 0 78 0
 
222006-MTIEP Registration Fees
50050-Sales, Service and Rentals 870 920 1,576 0
50020-Fees and Fines 12,309 9,874 8,600 7,276
Program Total: 25,794 21,826 17,807 14,340
Please limit all responses to 300 words
External Funding Data Pending

Note any special benefits (e.g., personnel support, equipment, permanent improvements) that the program has received in the past three years from its grants and other sponsored programs.

Relationships

How does the program benefit from donor gifts (e.g., scholarships, endowed chairs)? Does donor support provide a significant percentage of the program’s overall funding?

List two or three key relationships that the program maintains with external constituencies (e.g., community colleges, other universities, government bodies). How do these relationships advance the university mission or otherwise benefit the university?

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the resources generated by the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., revenue pass-throughs) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

 

Instructional Technology Center

  • Money generated from the materials purchased by students is used to replace the materials.

Development/Philanthropy Efforts

  • Stewardship and maintaining relationships with donors are a high priority for the Dean’s Office and stewardship. Cards are routinely sent for a donor’s birthday and in early November to thank them for their generosity and support of CEPS. As a result, we have seen donors provide more support for CEPS.
  • Our annual winetasting fundraiser has been a success in supporting programs across the College. The CEPS Winetasting Fundraiser raised $7000 in 2011, $12,000 in 2012, and $17,000 in 2013. The money raised has supported iPad carts, manikins with computer chips imbedded for CPR effectiveness, equipment for KSS and REC, faculty mentored undergraduate research, and student awards for faculty led short term study abroad programs.
  • Connections is one way we let our alumni and friends know where their money goes. By featuring what has been purchased or how students have benefitted from a scholarship/award, we are seeing more people deciding to endow scholarships. For FY14, we gave out 108 scholarships/awards for a total of $138,459.

Summer School

  • During the past 1 ½ years, the CEPS Administrative Council has been discussing innovations that could be used to increase summer school attendance, thereby increasing revenue. During Summer 2014, we will see the initial implementation of some of these ideas.
  • Use of summer school offerings to increase enrollment during the summer and linking to our programs to help increase enrollment during the academic year.

Grants

  • Personnel from the Dean’s Office are PI’s on grants involving teacher education.
  • An assistant to the dean is available to work with faculty on the budget portion of any CEPS grant proposal.

Curricular Offerings

  • Personnel are active participants in statewide IAI meetings.
  • The Dean’s Office encourages departments to look at their large feeder community colleges and create 2+2 agreements.
  • An Alternative Certification Program was offered until last year that provided another way for individuals to obtain their licensure. Resources generated offset much of the cost of the program.

MTIEP

  • A spring program is held to encourage minority middle and high school students to consider coming to EIU in the future. A summer camp is help for high school students with a focus on helping them prepare to be successful in college.

Criminal Background Checks

  • Money was collected to offset the cost of processing the paperwork. This is now handled by an outside vendor and no additional revenue will be collected.

Post-Bacc Evaluations

  • Money is collected for transcript evaluation prior to admission to a post-bacc teacher education program.

Key Relationships

  • ISBE
  • Area P-12 and ROE Administrators and other School District Personnel
  • Community Colleges
  • CEPS Alumni and Philanthropy Boards

Section 6: Productivity of the program

Productivity refers to the outcomes and resources generated by the program relative to its size and scope. Productivity measures tend to be quantitative, based on metrics like student credit hour production, degree completions, and number of students or other clientele served, relative to the size of the faculty or staff assigned to the program. A program's productivity can be negatively impacted if its resources are too thinly spread to achieve a critical mass or if its resources are imbalanced relative to program needs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Student Credit Hours Summary Data Pending
PROGRAM FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Average SCHs per faculty instructional credit unit
Average SCHs per faculty credit unit
Faculty costs per student credit hour
Personnel costs per student credit hour
Ledger-1 program costs per student credit hour
Degrees Conferred Summary Data Pending
Class Size For academic programs: Data excluding independent study, independent research, internships, and other individualized curricula.
For Colleges: Summary-level data

Summary Data Pending
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the productivity of the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., accreditation requirements, curricular changes, program restructuring) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

 

The CEPS Dean’s Office is an excellent steward of appropriated dollars. Some examples of cost saving measures follow.

  • CEPS holds the equipment portion of the budget centrally in order to find the lowest price for the items we ordered and have been able to obtain quantity discounts. While the numbers appear to show a huge budget centrally, most of the items purchased from this budget are for faculty and staff across the College.
  • By sending postcards to the majority of alumni and actual copies of Connections to donors and alumni graduating prior to 1980, CEPS reduced the cost of printing, publishing, and mailing the publication by over $6000. In FY14, e-mail was used to notify recipients and we reduced the cost by $2000.
  • The Chat Room has been sent using a listserv for many years. This year we will change to a new system making it easier to manage and more cost effective.
  • Graduation certification officers make use of the electronic degree audits and e-mail when corresponding with students to save on paper and printing expenses.
  • The Director of the ITC routinely updates department chairs, faculty and staff about free or inexpensive technology innovations.
  • Accreditation costs are paid by the Dean’s Office and with careful planning, we have not had to pay for more than one site visit per academic year which helps to balance the budget.
  • CEPS uses the new scholarship web interface designed by Financial Aid to designate scholarship recipients.
  • Unit A and Unit B faculty have full teaching loads and many are currently in an overload status.
  • Faculty, staff, and students all utilize the technology training opportunities by CATS.

Section 7: Costs associated with the program

Program analysis will be tied to the university's financial ledgers. A program by definition uses university resources, and tying to the accounting system helps ensure that no programs are overlooked in the analysis. Metrics in this criterion are used to identify all of the costs of delivering the program. Many of these costs are direct, but some may be implicit or indirect costs not directly associated with any financial payment. Programs may also be drivers of efficiencies that can help reduce the costs of delivering other programs.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Expenditures
Account 2011 2012 2013 2014
 
122000-CEPS Dean
60010-Administrative 436,586 442,501 446,926 442,659
60020-Civil Service 109,323 111,034 111,814 110,704
60030-Faculty - - 4,000 -
60040-Graduate Assistants 24,750 18,563 23,513 22,500
60050-Student Employees - 3,247 3,289 2,076
70020-Contractual Services 53,901 44,960 56,411 51,699
70030-Commodities 6,459 6,861 11,605 11,167
70040-Capital Expenditures 58,975 143,130 37,455 -
70050-Travel 12,070 15,738 16,761 14,531
Total: 702,064 786,032 711,773 655,335
60010-Administrative 50,430 42,986 43,973 46,035
60050-Student Employees 25 - - -
70020-Contractual Services 561 2,086 2,226 1,740
70030-Commodities 5,295 6,749 3,419 2,699
70050-Travel - - 42 129
Total: 56,310 51,820 49,660 50,603
 
122020-Alternate Routes to Teacher Cert
60010-Administrative 17,227 9,002 9,092 9,183
60020-Civil Service 25,341 18,627 8,969 6,042
60030-Faculty 4,890 5,052 5,052 -
70020-Contractual Services 1,030 1,026 264 -
70030-Commodities 1,487 - 10 -
70040-Capital Expenditures - 1,856 - -
70050-Travel 3,444 4,546 4,522 -
Total: 53,419 40,109 27,909 15,225
60030-Faculty 11,000 11,000 - -
60050-Student Employees - 1,413 2,203 -
70020-Contractual Services - 1 4,592 4,063
70030-Commodities 6,059 9,803 6,285 3,916
70040-Capital Expenditures - - 1,458 -
Total: 17,059 22,217 14,539 7,979
 
122040-Instructional Materials Center
60050-Student Employees 11,719 16,553 17,962 12,431
70020-Contractual Services 572 236 236 236
70030-Commodities 138 491 - 98
70040-Capital Expenditures 534 - - -
Total: 12,963 17,280 18,199 12,766
60010-Administrative 8,891 9,002 9,092 9,183
60020-Civil Service 7,708 800 800 -
60030-Faculty 32,228 27,290 15,604 -
60050-Student Employees 5,700 4,800 4,500 -
70020-Contractual Services 8,126 6,027 6,074 -
70030-Commodities 1,030 544 1,660 -
70050-Travel 111 - 132 -
Total: 63,793 48,463 37,862 9,183
 
122070-Web Courses Alternate Certification
60010-Administrative 12,447 12,603 12,729 12,856
60040-Graduate Assistants 16,088 16,088 15,165 15,390
70020-Contractual Services 7,337 7,336 7,336 7,336
70030-Commodities 281 71 - 109
70050-Travel 251 46 - -
Total: 36,405 36,143 35,230 35,692
60040-Graduate Assistants - 7,425 - -
70020-Contractual Services - 25 - 40
70030-Commodities 523 83 1,177 -
70040-Capital Expenditures - - 3,920 -
70050-Travel - 104 750 781
Total: 523 7,638 5,846 821
 
222002-CEPS Post-Baccalaureate Fee
60050-Student Employees 1,543 895 - -
70020-Contractual Services 291 293 1,398 369
70030-Commodities 593 1,284 257 391
70040-Capital Expenditures - - 121 1,899
Total: 2,427 2,472 1,776 2,659
60050-Student Employees 3,036 - 1,353 425
70020-Contractual Services 495 317 23 -
70030-Commodities - 2,376 1,042 729
Total: 3,531 2,693 2,419 1,154
 
222004-Center For Educational Studies
60020-Civil Service - - - 200
60030-Faculty 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,000
70020-Contractual Services 40 653 859 701
70030-Commodities 93 156 561 1,254
70040-Capital Expenditures - - - 521
Total: 2,633 3,309 3,920 5,676
60030-Faculty - - 5,500 -
60050-Student Employees - - 3,200 -
70020-Contractual Services - 163 4,023 910
70030-Commodities - 319 759 -
Total: - 482 13,482 910
 
222007-IMC Materials
70020-Contractual Services 1,707 1,339 1,929 1,050
70030-Commodities 10,319 8,728 5,390 5,754
70040-Capital Expenditures 118 1,195 - -
Total: 12,144 11,262 7,319 6,804
Program Total: 963,271 1,029,921 929,934 804,807
Staffing
122000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 11.70 11.20 9.20 12.03 12.20
Admin/Professional 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20
Civil Service 4.50 3.00 3.00 2.83 3.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00
122010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.87 0.87 0.53 0.53 0.53
Admin/Professional 0.87 0.87 0.53 0.53 0.53
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
122020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 2.53 2.53 2.20 1.20 0.70
Admin/Professional 0.53 0.53 0.20 0.20 0.20
Civil Service 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.50
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
122040 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 4.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 5.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 4.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 5.00
122050 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 2.03 1.03 0.70 0.20 0.20
Admin/Professional 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Civil Service 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
122070 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 2.20 2.20 0.20 2.20 2.20
Admin/Professional 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
222001 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
222002 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
222003 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Head-Count (Not FTE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Admin/Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Faculty 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unit B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Non-negotiated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Graduate Assistants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Student Workers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the costs associated with the program. Note any clarifications or special circumstances (e.g., expenditures made centrally or externally, expenditures made on behalf of other units) that should be considered when reviewing the above data.

 

The CEPS Dean’s Office has been creative and economical in the use of resources – both human and financial.

  • Over the past four years, units under the Dean’s Office have been consolidated in order to use our support staff more effectively. Two staff members (1 ½ FTE) retired and one staff (1 FTE) member passed away. None of the positions (2 ½ FTE) were replaced. Two graduate assistants were hired to provide technical technology assistance for the ITC – a greater need than a clerical position. The clerk in the Dean’s Office now spends a portion of her time in the ITC providing clerical support.
  • Equipment reserve money is held centrally and most CEPS equipment is purchased centrally. This allows us to take advantage of discounts offered when purchasing large numbers of items (ie: computers). Smaller pieces of equipment are purchased departmentally.
  • TRM monies come directly to CEPS and are distributed to the appropriate departments.
  • Telefund money is held in the Dean’s account but each department is notified by the CEPS Development Committee of the funds available to them for scholarships and/or faculty support.
  • CEPS reduced the cost of printing, publishing, and mailing Connections during the past few years – even with the increasing numbers of CEPS alumni, postage and printing costs. (FY 11 $6059, FY12 $9803, FY13 $9985, and FY14 $7979)
  • One assistant to the dean focuses on personnel and budgeting while monitoring the following budget line items:
  • civil service pay deficits.
  • faculty pay deficits (new faculty salaries, temp extra help, overload CU pay).
  • faculty travel paid by Dean’s Office.
  • faculty search expenses.
  • new faculty moving expenses.

Section 8: Program impact on university mission

This criterion may be considered a catch-all for relevant information not covered elsewhere. It focuses on reasons why a program should be maintained or strengthened, the essentiality of the program to the university and its mission, the contributions that the program makes to other programs' successes, and the benefits that the university receives from having the program. The university's vision calls for making personal connections and having a global reach and impact, and programs may have unique aspects that contribute to this vision.

Please limit all responses to 300 words
Distinctive and Unique Aspects

How does the program seek to distinguish itself from similar programs at other institutions?

Note any unique and/or essential contributions that the program makes to the university.

Program-specific Metrics (optional)

Provide any program-specific metrics that help to document program contributions or program quality. Examples of some commonly used program-specific metrics may be found here.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand the program impact on the university mission.

 

CEPS faculty and staff engage in numerous initiatives that support EIU’s mission.

  • All undergraduate and graduate programs include practica/fieldwork/internships/student teaching as required components of a degree program.
  • Eight different faculty led short term study abroad programs to have been developed and offered by CEPS faculty from six different academic departments. (Bahamas, Toronto, Ireland, Serbia, China, Germany, India, and Great Britain) One additional program to Montreal is under development.
  • Fundraising efforts in 2013 and 2014 are focused on supporting CEPS students participating in CEPS faculty led short term study abroad programs.
  • Faculty in KSS established a faculty exchange program with the University of Winchester. This resulted in our students going to Winchester for a short term study abroad program and their faculty and students visiting EIU in Fall 2013.
  • CEPS is a member of COST (Consortium for Overseas Student Teaching) and sends up to 10 student teachers abroad every year.
  • The CEPS Minority Recruitment and Retention Committee focuses attention on how we might be better able to recruit and retain both faculty and students in CEPS.
  • Faculty routinely mentor undergraduates participating in NCUR and a CEPS student(s) has attended every year.
  • CEPS graduate faculty routinely involve groups of students (undergraduate and graduate) in research projects resulting in numerous refereed presentations and publications.

Section 9: Future opportunities for the program

No program has all the resources it wants or needs, and new or reallocated funds are scarce. This criterion provides an opportunity analysis to identify new and innovative ideas to promote a sustainable academic and financial future for the university. Identifiable trends in student demographics and interests, technological developments, and partnerships with businesses, schools, alumni, and donors are just a few possible avenues for future opportunities. Many of the opportunities that programs identify will tie back to the university's strategic plan, which specifies six key areas that we want to enhance or strengthen.

Planning Limit all responses to 300 words

Provide a link to or listing of the program’s goals and/or strategic plan.

What role will the program have in the implementation of the university’s strategic plan (provide link to strategic plan)?

Opportunities Limit all responses to 500 words

What are the program’s two or three most promising opportunities that could help advance the university’s academic mission? Provide an estimate of additional investments or other costs required and additional student credit hours, revenue, or other resources generated.

Comments (optional)

If needed, provide supplemental comments to help the reader understand future opportunities for the program.

 

A brief listing of future opportunities for CEPS follows.

  • Teacher Assessment Support Center (TASC) – provides support to EIU students as they navigate the state testing requirements to become a teacher.
  • Provide support for the integration of the edTPA-a new licensure requirement in Illinois beginning 2015.
  • Instructional Technology Center (ITC) – provides low to high technology support for students, staff and faculty as well as the equipment and materials to create unique bulletin boards.
  • New academic programs – created based on a needs analysis and inventory of programs at EIU and statewide along with employment outlook and trend data.
  • Adult and Community Education – B.S. (At IBHE for review and approval)
  • Health Promotion and Leadership – M.S. (Approved by CEPS Curriculum Committee 11-11-13)
  • Graduate Certificate Program in English as a Second Language Instruction– Collaborative effort among these departments – EC/ELE/MLE, SED, CSD, FLG, and ENG
  • Enhancing the faculty led short term study abroad offerings in CEPS.
  • Expanding the departments who are mentoring students attending NCUR.
  • Cross-training CEPS staff so that there is always someone available to answer questions asked by students, faculty, advisors, parents, other EIU personnel, or prospective students.
  • Expanding our partnerships with Community Colleges through the use of 2+2 agreements and other creative methods of program delivery.
  • Supporting the implementation of improvements recommended by the Quality Endowment Process Management Committee. These improvements should result in future cost-savings as well as enhanced donor satisfaction and increased gifts to the University and the College.